Microsoft Probing If DeepSeek-Linked Group Improperly Obtained OpenAI Data

The irony is overwhelming

An irony curtain.

What, you mean like Microsoft, uh, OpenAI did?

Yep, NOW it's a problem, though! Because it's someone else doing the same thing, someone who isn't part of the human centipede starting at Trump's colon.

we stole it fair and square

It’s no crime to steal from a thief.

How could it be better when they just stole everything? The fact that its better basically proves that its not stolen.

Stealing from thieves isn't a crime.

Especially not when China turns around and Robin Hoods it back to the world.

Just saying.

China really did one on our oligarchs haha
Beautiful
These parasites expect me to side with them?
Making R1 open source really makes it such a big FU to all the grifters asking for billions for AI in the us. Especially funny because high-flyer is a hedge fund firm themselves. The ai race should only be determined by what you do with it, not protecting how much IP you hoovered up and are now trying to cry about it being copied by others.

“You can’t steal that public data! We stole it first!”

And considering that’s exactly what Microsoft did to Apple with point and click, what irony!

They both stole point and click from Xerox if my memory serves me correctly
- yeah xerox invented the GUI and mouse
- Apple did pay Xerox for it if I'm remembering right
Oh really? **Rabbit hole unlocked
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFcb-XF1RPQ
  The relevant part of Pirates of Silicon Valley. After which you should watch the whole thing. It’s fan fiction, but it’s the best explanation of what happened between Apple and Microsoft leading into the 1990s.
They didn’t steal it from Smith & Wesson?

What data? they one OpenAI illegally obtained first?!

I’m sure now that OpenAI accuses DeepSeek of stealing they will now prove that they have rights to things that are being stolen, right? XD

Somebody better call the WAHMBULANCE!

Surely they'd like some cheese to go with that whine?

Are they worried that deepsink too stuff written by others, mixed it up, and repackaged it as it's own?

Well, yeah, that's all AI is. An expensive weighted pachinko machine, that uses human made content, and remixes it.

The question isn't whether they've used the same information. It's whether they've faked the process to achieve that 20x efficiency.
Look at it like a dictionary. Writing one from scratch is a huge task, no matter how many other books exist. How do you even go about finding all of the words?
But if other people have already written dictionaries, you can just use their word lists and go from there.
It's more efficient, but only because it's a completely different task.
- No AI company has ever made any of their own content to train their models, they took what others created, remixed it, and presented it as something new.
  This AI model did the same thing.
  AI lost its job to AI.
Is it worth it? Let me work it I put my thing down, flip it and reverse it

Time to talk about data rights :)

What’s the game plan if they did?

Trade restrictions?

China already proved those did fuck all to stop them from developing their own model.

Ducking knew this ai bubble would burst sooner or later, just glad we can finally get on with it now.

I ducking knew it too, I've been a long for the ride though. The models still do have some niche applications where they're actually useful.
This whole thing with OpenAI and Microsoft whinging about fair play is truly laughable though. What clowns.
As a side note, it took a few tries to write ducking, my keyboard kept correcting it to fucking. We're definitely 2 different people. Lol.
Name the company involved a military asset
Forbid US companies from hosting the models
Pressure foreign companies to not work with them

So that means that Microsoft will pay compensation to us, right?

Article from ft https://www.ft.com/content/a0dfedd1-5255-4fa9-8ccc-1fe01de87ea6

https://archive.is/D9whR

Looks like Microsoft is bracing for today’s earnings call

Lol its like fucking lavrov from fucking russia screaming "this is against international law" when Europe froze their assets.

Bro... US reaction here is so pathetic...
The behavior is indicative of a bigger issue. They really do think only they are allowed to cheat and steal to win lol

If I stole from the thief, is it really stealing?

some Philosopher probably

In Brazil, there's a rhymed saying: "ladrão que rouba ladrão tem 100 anos de perdão", it translates to "a thief that steals from a thief has 100 years of forgiveness"
- It's a common proverb in Portuguese, not just in Brazil.

When a writer copies someone else's work without cites or compensation, it's called "plagiarism." But when an AI does it, it's called "LLM training."

Unless that AI is not OpenAI, then it's "plagiarism" still.
When a reader reads someone else’s work that’s called “reading”. But when an AI does it, it’s called “training”.

When you can't beat em, sue em. It's the American way.

"Tom, if irony was strawberries we'd all be drinking smoothies right now"

Microsoft Probing If DeepSeek-Linked Group Improperly Obtained data the same way OpenAI did. --FTFY

What the fuck is Microsoft getting involved for?! Maybe concentrate on not providing shitty fucking software fuck heads!

They have a large stake in OpenAI, last I checked.
- Oh fair, i didnt know that. But still, fuck Microsoft.

OMG Competition!

QUICK, they're a foreign threat! They're coming right for us!!!!

Maybe they could buy a spare one from AliBaba. Maybe that would help..

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/alibaba-releases-ai-model-it-claims-surpasses-deepseek-v3-2025-01-29/

"Waaaaah" you say?

lol, I love it. I'm thinking about paying for DeepSeek even though I hate AI bullshit, just to spite all the panicking AI tech scammers. This has seriously made my week, the amount of copium they are inhaling is insanely funny :D

Use duck duck go ai chat https://duck.ai/
- Isn't the OpenAI one they offer the same one as the one provided at https://chatgpt.com/ without login? So probably something not as impactful.
  Or do they share their unlimited subscription?
If I had money to spend, I would get a ChatGPT subscription since they lose money for every account.
- The whole startup industry rely on investors to cover for their costs for years, while they work on a loss, in order to obtain a bigger market share. Look at Netflix, Facebook, WhatsApp, etc.
  So buying an account you are increasing their market share.
  But feel free to use Mistral, Deepseek, etc. that would be better
- Just rent some server space instead and run your open-weights model of choice
- You have to use it a lot. From what I can tell that's their problem, they priced unlimited access low based on some numbers they pulled out their arse and then were all shocked Pikachu face when people used it and unlimited amount.
- I had a subscription but I barely used it, maybe twice a day with no complex stuff. I don’t get how it’s possible to lose money on users like me. I finally cancelled because of the price.
- That's only for the 200$ one, and if you use it constantly, no?