Trump's second term is a 'billionaire feeding frenzy', says AOC
Trump's second term is a 'billionaire feeding frenzy', says AOC
www.independent.co.uk
Trump’s second term is a ‘billionaire feeding frenzy,’ says AOC
62 comments
-
-
Listen, they're going to try to get that third term, but they'll ultimately fail, and the only point of this presidency is to give Trump's donors as much favour as he can, as the CIA collects dossiers on all of them so that Trump can retire as the new Epstein.
Worst part about it? They're going to fuck shit up and republicans will fit DECADES claim he was one of the best presidents ever.
Alexa, remind me of this post in 10 years.
-
So much for getting rid of "the elite"
-
Joke’s on America, WE are the swamp.
-
-
Feed them lead
-
Very true, but it's not like Harris was signaling she was going to eliminate billionaires by seizing all of their wealth. So both parties are the same, right?
-
-
What are you even talking about? Her net worth is -47k to 45k as of 2023. Her only income is her salary from Congress, she doesn't even invest in stocks because she (rightly) sees it as insider trading for anyone in Congress to invest in stocks. She is one of the poorest members in Congress, trumpers just can't comprehend someone not exploiting their position for personal gain so they make stuff up lol
-
What are you talking about?
-
it’s almost like AI generated anti-Democrat spam
-
-
I did a very simple search for you. This was one of the first results.
-
Sauce? I thought not.
-
62 comments
It’s worth watching the whole video, AOC is the type of politician that actually has a chance to have a party that represents the working class.
I hope the Democrats can figure out before the last minute that she's a really viable candidate for President.
Most D's are captured by most of the same corporations and oligarchs as the R's. They will never allow a working class movement. Only corporate-whore lite.
They know she's popular enough to win a general election one day, just as they knew Bernie was. But the moderate crowd would rather lose with one of their own than win with a progressive
My micropenis submarine has already banned AOC from X.com because I saved drowning underaged malaysian soccer players from the pedos in the so-called british special forces.
No she's not. She is a women and Americans well not vote for a woman for president. Sorry it is the truth and they have to stop doing that.
At this point I'm concerned for her safety. She's one of our last hopes.
If it was Russia, she would have already fell out of a window.
Can private security be crowdfunded? /s
A lot of others "losing" secret service protection is quite a clue to how the new regime expects violence and intimidation to be enacted.
Really? I mean she might be great but she is a women. America choose trump over a women. If the Dems run a women again then they deserve to loose again. They you and me might be fine with a women president but America is not.
Why the Democrat party doesn't capitalize on that is proof the billionaires control everything
“Democrat party” 👍🏻
Saying "proof" is not enough here. Can you elaborate?
She's in a tough spot because she dislikes a lot of what the Democratic party is doing and also refuses to even meet with lobbyists let alone take their money. To a ton of everyday people these are very good things but to either of the parties this is an enemy to the party that doesn't have the firepower to win an election. Of course, I would absolutely love to be wrong on this but history (especially recently) is not on her side.
In the 2020 primary Bernie and Warren were regularly leading in donations. And in 2016 and 2024 Trump won despite raising less money throughout most of the campaign. Big money is not the be all and end all of politics, and when people believe in a candidate large sums can be raised.
She's is a fucking sheepdog, that's all she is. Giving disenfranchised voters the illusion that if they stick around long enough, they too can have a seat at their table. She's a snake in the grass that cannot be trusted.
With this attitude you must trust absolutely 0 politicians i guess? Where do you go from there?
Why do you say that? Everything that I've heard her say has been principled and thoughtful. I haven't read anything about her actions that I find problematic either.
So... citation needed?
Many citations needed. Or is all of that just your opinion provided without reasoning?