2y ago

Judge dismisses lawsuit by sorority sisters who sought to block a transgender woman from joining

A judge has dismissed a lawsuit contesting a transgender woman’s admission into a sorority at the University of Wyoming, ruling that he could not override how the private, voluntary organization defined a woman and order that she not belong.

In the lawsuit, six members of the Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority chapter challenged Artemis Langford’s admission by casting doubt on whether sorority rules allowed a transgender woman. Wyoming U.S. District Court Judge Alan Johnson, in his ruling, found that sorority bylaws don’t define who’s a woman.

The case at Wyoming’s only four-year public university drew widespread attention as transgender people fight for more acceptance in schools, athletics, workplaces and elsewhere, while others push back.

100 comments

This is all just absolutely wild to me because I went to an all-women’s college and we had no issues accepting trans women (there was a trans woman there when I was a student and it was honestly no big thing for anyone), and that was quite a while ago (I’m so old lol). But NOW it’s a damn issue? I feel like we’ve regressed so much and it’s painful.
- Conservatives won on abortion and have found the next entry in the "then they came for" list.
- The bigots got ballsy once they got unified, if we want things back the way they were we need to beat bigots back into the shadows of society and encourage behaviours that makes them run. No tolerance for intolerance.
- It became the de jure culture war issue. People who didn't care before, do now -- because now it's a team sport.
- It’s an issue ONLY because it’s a useful angle for Tempe culture wars. Look how they have turned some gays against each other with this anti trans bullshit. It’s only an issue now because gays are too popular and so trans is a nice little niche group that can be persecuted without as much PR damage
- It feels that way because we have, thanks to the "Christian" right directing the full force of their propaganda machine at demonizing trans people.
- Were they living in your house?
  
  I've lived with a transgender woman for ten years now. Still alive, still happy, still single.
  
  Not in my dorm, no. But she was living on campus in a dorm and no one seemed to give the smallest of fucks at the time. I wouldn’t have cared in the slightest had she been living in my dorm.
  Oh and.
  Anassa kata kalo kale,
  Ia, ia, ia, Nike!
  Bryn Mawr, Bryn Mawr, Bryn Mawr
  TRANS WOMEN ARE WOMEN.
  
  How would that change anything?
  
  Why is your question downvoted to oblivion? How DARE you ask where the person was living! Wow.
Worth noting that this was not a great leap - the judge didn't rule anything particularly interesting about trans rights, he simply said that freedom of association means you can't go to court to force a private organization to exclude someone.
- Exactly. I disagree strongly with the sorority's decision, but can/should we compel individuals to hang out with people they don't want to hang out with?
  If the group receives public money, it's a whole different situation
  
  I'm assuming that the majority of members are fine with this, otherwise they'd simply change their bylaws to exclude trans women (and probably get away with doing so for the same legal reason). These 6 members were probably the losers of some internal battle who went to court to try to get their way anyway and failed.
  
  The sorority admitted the trans woman. This suit was filed by members of the sorority in an attempt to force the sorority to exclude her as a member. Are you sure you strongly disagree with the sorority's decision to admit a trans woman?
  
  I disagree strongly with the sorority’s decision
  to not exclude the trans woman?
  can/should we compel individuals to hang out with people they don’t want to hang out with?
  of course not, but if the people who don't want to "hang out" with others only don't want to because of wilfully ignorant hate (in other words - for no good reason, and of course this isn't about not wanting to hang out this is about excluding and attempting to erase an entire group of people), it shouldn't be the person who they hate for no good reason who is excluded, but them.
  
  Well, the ones who don't want to hang out with others are free to leave.
  
  Desegregation seems to have worked out better than segregation did for the affected minorities. Why wouldn't it be the same here?
Imagine having the time and resources to be such a shit in this way. The main thing is don't be a transphobe, but then a substantial secondary thing is get a life.
- How else are you going to conserve your world view?
Good good. Hope they lose a very expensive defamation case next.
- Good god why does everything have to revolve around that shit show. I thought we moved on given that all parties were proved to be idiots with their own issues in that case especially when the struck documents were exposed. No one came out smelling like a rose after that. Let’s Move on.
  
  What?
Fucking nonsense. The sorority defined what woman meant when they voted to admit the member. There was no possible context this should've been filed. Those lawyers need to be sanctioned for even filling something like this.
Edit: judge didn't even dismiss it with prejudice https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wyd.63248/gov.uscourts.wyd.63248.31.0.pdf
This is the best summary I could come up with:
(AP) — A judge has dismissed a lawsuit contesting a transgender woman’s admission into a sorority at the University of Wyoming, ruling that he could not override how the private, voluntary organization defined a woman and order that she not belong.
Wyoming U.S. District Court Judge Alan Johnson, in his ruling, found that sorority bylaws don’t define who’s a woman.
The case at Wyoming’s only four-year public university drew widespread attention as transgender people fight for more acceptance in schools, athletics, workplaces and elsewhere, while others push back.
“With its inquiry beginning and ending there, the court will not define a ‘woman’ today,” Johnson wrote.
But while the lawsuit portrayed Langford as a “sexual predator,” claims about her behavior turned out to be a “nothing more than a drunken rumor,” Berkness said.
An attorney for the sorority sisters, Cassie Craven, said by email they disagreed with the ruling and the fundamental issue — the definition of a woman — remains undecided.
The original article contains 362 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Fucking bigots.
- Disagree.
  It was Kappa Kappa Gamma that accepted Artemis Langford.
  These six girls were suing the sorority because they wanted to prevent Kappa Kappa Gamma from accepting transgender people.
  The sorority is the hero here for successfully defending its decision to accept transgender members.
- Reading is fundamental 😉
- I see you didn’t read it nor the write up directly at the top.

100 comments