Mark Zuckerberg has been diagnosed with a serious medical condition
Mark Zuckerberg has been diagnosed with a serious medical condition
50 comments
-
-
Didja edit that OP? ๐
-
I'm shocked and horrified. I expect higher standards from my shitposting community
-
Trust broken
-
-
Betcha Zuckerberg added this response himself.
Or some kiss-up middle manager ordered an overqualified underling to do it. Probably that.
-
Kissing up or ligmaing down
-
-
-
AI is getting more cringe by the minute
-
You got my hopes up until I realized it's a joke
-
Ligma is a SERIOUS condition, it's nothing to joke about
-
-
Lizards don't get ligma I think, but hard to say since it's a fictional decease... :)
-
Lizards get ligma eyes, it's a different strain. Like bird flu vs human flu.
-
-
Of course he can't get ligma. As a Mind Goblin he's immune to ligma.
-
As they have no butts?
-
-
ligma?
-
Ligma balls!
No really, that's the joke lol
-
-
I thought Zuck was a robot.
-
50 comments
Ai ๐๐ช๐๐ญ ๐ต๐๐ฌ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ด
While I don't agree with anti-AI people, the fact that some AI generated content is flawed doesn't imply that all AI content is of bad quality.
Companies are already replacing some workforce with LLMs.
As someone who works with LLMs, they shouldn't...
You still need your chatbot to stick to business rules and act like a real customer service rep, and that's incredibly hard to accomplish with generative models where you cannot be there to evaluate the generated answers and where the chatbot can go on a tangent and suddenly start to give you free therapy when you originally went in to order pizza.
Don't get me wrong, they're great for many applications within the manual loop. They can help customer service reps (as one example) function better, provide more help to users, and dedicate more time to those who still need a human to solve their issues.
My opinion right now is that companies want you to believe they are 100% capable of replacing humans, but that's because people in upper management never listen to the damn developers down in the basement (aka me), so they have an unrealistic expectation of AI coupled with an unending desire for money and success.
They are replacing them because they are greedy cunts, not because they are replaceable.
It feels like you don't think the people making these decisions see employee salaries as anything but a line item to minimize or "customer service" as a cost liability. They don't care about customer experience. Hell, they actively want people to get frustrated and give up because it saves the company money.
Can you list a few companies that are replacing workforce with LLMs successfully? Without a downgrade in service quality?
If by "companies" you mean scammers - sure.
Yes, about the same time crypto will become main currency and NFTs replace traditional art in museums.
It's coming, you hust don't understand. /s