Zloubida @ zloubida @lemmy.world

Posts

7

Comments

358

Joined

2 yr. ago

C'est la voie.

Not really. Anarchists generally recognize the authority of specialists (scientists, doctors, …), they just refute them the right to impose their ideas on individual. It's a little stretch, but officers in an anarchist army would be like specialists, whose authority is not imposed, but freely recognized.

You know everything, apparently.

Pe is the true way.

Bro…

Oh I know more or less how the American law works. But I think it's a bad one, that's all.

I'm French, and in France hate speech is illegal. Negation of crimes against humanity is illegal. Defamation is illegal. And you know what? France is still a free country. Freer even maybe, as our other freedoms and rights (like our rights to live peacefully) are more protected.

I disagree. Free speech should have limits, like every other freedom, because freedoms oppose each others. Insults, defamation, threats, calls for hatred, lies, … shouldn't be covered by free speech.

Thank you for your answer.

Please ignore me if you think my question is uncalled-for, but your answer surprises me. I get agnosticism and atheism from a philosophical point of view, even if philosophically I stand in the theist side. I get the feeling of disgust when one studies history and actuality of religions, even if I think it's kind of a limited, one-sided view. But disgust for the mere idea of the existence of God seems… a bit extreme. What did you mean?

Yeah I like him, even if he had bad stances on some subjects (like Israel or abortion). He's too much on the evangelical side to me, even if he was not an actual evangelical. But was right on sooooo much subjects!

I don't think atheism is central to anarchism. Opposition to religion (in its institutional and hierarchical form) is, but not belief in a higher being per se.

Anarchism can make Christianity non-authoritarian, and Christianity can teach anarchism how to be spiritual. Of course nor anarchism nor Christianity need each other, but I like how they complete each other.

Anarchism should be communism + Christianity.

Yes, I agree. I meant the point about heaven 🙂.

But we have the Uewersauer lake!

I know it's shitposting, but even if we accept the idea that God would be interested by what you do with your own body when you're alone, isn't the whole point of the Bible that you don't have to climb to go to heaven, but accept God's grace?

I.don't understand evangelicalism.

Jlai.lu is more a francophone than strictly French instance, even if as far as I know most admins are French.

Let's put !luxembourg@lemmy.world in lemmy.dbzer0.com 😁

You don't think being reified is demeaning?

However:

I suspect your view may be distorted by algorithms feeding you content they expect you to enjoy.

And an accusation. Let's stop, you don't discuss in good faith.

I'll ignore as much parts of your comments as I want when you don't answer to mine but derail the discussion.

However let's explain. Porn, in its mainstream form, doesn't show a sane form of sexuality, where the desires and needs of all participants are met, but shows women as objects of male pleasure. If, from an individual point of view that doesn't present any problem (I won't kink-shame women, nor men, nor gender fluid people, who like being sexually reified), as a form of media it normalizes a vision of womanhood as essentially inferior to manhood, as women being necessarily at the service of men, and thus is a product and reinforcement of rape culture.

Your argument is the porn version of #NotAllMen 😂