Mieten sind i.d.R. nicht so kurzfristig, weshalb die bevorzugte Bezeichnung "Geschlechtsteildienstleistungsfachpersonalabstämmling" ist. Ebenso versichert "Abstämmling" im Gegensatz zu "Nachkomme" die leibliche Verwandtschaft.
In the US there isn't but as far as I can tell, over here in Germany lawyers and doctors are not permitted to report past crimes. The damage has been done and there is no harm to prevent anymore, as such keeping confidentiality has a higher priority than the state's desire to prosecute crimes.
Even if these groups become aware of future planned crimes, they are not obligated to report anything if they genuinely attempt to prevent the person from comitting the crime (except for murder, manslaughter, kidnapping/taking hostages, genocide or war crimes).
How does the nonexistant confidentiality of lawyers prevent them from deciding to stop being your lawyer and become a witness against you? I.e. you are accused of a crime, admit said crime to your lawyer, your lawyer then becomes a witness stating you admitted to the crime.
Maybe it's because Mr. Controversial Gesture, alias Sir The Nazis Were Actually Leftists aka Dr. Only The AfD Can Save Germany rivals only Ford in his open support of fasism? You know, Henry Ford, the guy Adolf Hitler called "a great man"?
You wouldn't have a notebook. Any and all stimuli would be banned as the purpose is making your experience horrible.
Also, you get incredibly mundane tasks as well. Maybe you'll get a couple sheets of random symbols and are tasked to count a certain letter. And if you don't do this task you can be laid off for underperforming.
The Night of the Long Knives is only applicable if the judge herself were a nazi who is seen as a potential threat due to being slightly differently aligned than the main faction.
My comment argues that claiming antisemitism includes discrimination against anyone who is a semite has zero historical basis. It would also now exclude many Jews who are not semites yet were targeted by the Anti-Semites.
Of course genocide is bad. But anyone arguing Palestinians should be genocided because they are all "antisemites" will never be convinced by arguments. Therefore, there is no point in attempting to adjust the definition of antisemitism.
It assumes the man is being imprisoned for just cause
Guantanamo Bay doesn't rely on any cause though? It's literally a US torture camp where nothing matters. No due process, no just cause, no nothing. It's worse than CECOT in everything but scale.
Have you ever seen any country's opposition figure successfully demand something from another country? I personally haven't. Usually the government alone controls any and all foreign relations.
Hell, Israel has literally detained and deported two British MPs on a parliamentary delegation - not just a visit. And they're part of the governing party, no less!
It's genuinely not surprising that El Salvador reacts this way. It's the literal default reaction to a nongovernmental politician demanding something.
And yes, I think it's appalling that the I
US deports anyone and everyone, legally or otherwise. This doesn't affect El Salvador though since they detain whoever the US sends there. The US argues this man is a terrorist, therefore this is sufficient justification for them.
Had Britain started deporting migrants to Rwanda and a MP from the Green Party requested to visit someone "mistakenly" deported, they would've been denied access as well.
I just really don't think there's anything noteworthy in the rejection alone.
It should be fairly normal to decline a random politician from another country a request no one else gets.
It reeks a bit of American exceptionalism that US senators should get special rights. If a random politician from, say, the Netherlands asked to see someone held in Guantanamo Bay the US will do fuck all to accommodate this request.
My comment is not a justification for the deportation of that guy by the way. I just don't think it should be notable, as random politicians usually enjoy much, much fewer rights than head of states.
Hamas is still the legal successor of the PLO in Gaza though?? Everything the PLO signed/declared is valid in Gaza until Hamas revokes it. That's literally how succession of states/governments works. There hasn't been a revolution in Gaza, it has been a (relatively) peaceful transfer of power.
This occurs regardless of what you think of one authority. Governments do not void anything and everything the previous government has done.
It's utterly insane you consider civilians to deserve death. I will never understand how anyone with a working moral compass can justify killing civilians. People like you are the fuel genocide engines run on.
196 countries signed and ratified all 4 Geneva Conventions, with 174 of them having further ratified the procol I quoted.
Most signatories are not "on board" with Israel ignoring this document, unless you somehow believe Western countries are the only countries to matter. And even then, there are various notable dissenters such as Ireland.
The Geneva Convention absolutely apply to international conflict, otherwise no country would bother with upholding them at least partially.
Why does Israel even fight the ICC instead of simply ignoring it? If it had no impact they could save the attorney resources they are spending. It's because it very much impacts them in terms of international relations. Every single international treaty relies on trust alone. Become untrustworthy and you will get worse deals.
And it does very much apply to Gaza. The internationally recognized representation of the state of Palestine who claim jurisdiction over Gaza has signed it shortly after becoming a non-member state of the UN. There is no country on this planet who has signed the Geneva Convention but considers Gaza to not be bound by it.
Also, before Hamas even existed, the PLO declared themselves bound by the Geneva Conventions. The only reason they didn't sign the declaration was because the UN didn't consider Palestine a state. Hamas has not rescinded this declaration from what I have found.
By the way, there is no "application" for civilian status. Either you are a civilian or you are not. And no one on this planet considers reservists to be soldiers unless they intend to kill civilians. A 100 year old Israeli in a hospital bed would be deserving of execution according to your definition.
Mieten sind i.d.R. nicht so kurzfristig, weshalb die bevorzugte Bezeichnung "Geschlechtsteildienstleistungsfachpersonalabstämmling" ist. Ebenso versichert "Abstämmling" im Gegensatz zu "Nachkomme" die leibliche Verwandtschaft.