You can always have one more
yetAnotherUser @ yetAnotherUser @discuss.tchncs.de Posts 2Comments 622Joined 1 yr. ago
yetAnotherUser @ yetAnotherUser @discuss.tchncs.de
Posts
2
Comments
622
Joined
1 yr. ago
- Germany, 1916 and 1942
Something something boiling frog
Turret3857 is not in the sudoers file.
This incident will be reported.
There is significant proof of benefits:
Positive outcomes were decreased suicidality in adulthood, improved affect and psychological functioning, and improved social life. Adverse factors associated with use were changes in body composition, slow growth, decreased height velocity, decreased bone turnover, cost of drugs, and lack of insurance coverage.
https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12437
I can't vouch for the quality of this literature review (because I don't want to take an hour or more to read a paper for a Lemmy comment), but usually literature reviews show a fuller picture than individual studies.
Also, this sentence is in the conclusion:
Although large long-term studies with diverse and multicultural populations have not been done, the evidence to date supports the finding of few serious adverse outcomes and several potential positive outcomes.
You're wasting tiles
BABA is YOU
has
STORY and
Vaccines can have devastating permanent side effects. Should parents no longer vaccinate their children?
The answer for both is:
Whichever option does less harm should be taken. A delayed puberty, despite potential long-term risks does less harm than a trans child going through the "wrong" puberty.
Besides, due to the start of puberty having a pretty large range there should in theory be little harm until the age of 14 or so. And at that age children are much more capable of deciding on medical treatments than as preteens.
Wouldn't that be akin to adding new features? Adding support for previously unsupported (due to their lack of existance) hardware is a feature imo.
Besides, while a program may eventually be bug-free, no modern computer has flawless hardware so creating a large program without bugs will always remain a thought experiment.
The only possible reason to do it would be if an alien civilization were to demand producing such a program or else they'd destroy Earth (similar to Erdős's thought experiment with finding Ramsey numbers). Perhaps with all of humanity's resources and a few decades this could be done.
Absolutely, I was thinking more along the lines of focusing solely on bug-fixing.
Eventually: Yes.
There are a finite number of bugs (or bug types rather, you could have infinitely many bugs from the same few lines of code) and it will take finite time to fix them all. You cannot know when you have fixed all of them though. But some games have gone above and beyond with fixing bugs, like Factorio where you will not encounter bugs without explicitly looking for them.
A further requirement is the coziness of the space right around the bed though.
A bed on top of a garbage dump is not cozy because of the terrible smells.
A bed right next to an airport's runway isn't cozy because of the deafening sound of planes etc.
Assuming the bathroom is in a hallway, having the door open into the hallway would cause the flight path to be narrowed which would be against (some) fire code(s).
After all, significantly more people would want to flee through the hallway than out of a room adjacent to the hallway.
That might not be up to fire standards demanding doors in the hallway to be opened to the inside of the room.
No, because by definition criminals have already done an act such that their imprisonment is legal, if done by the state.
Imprisonment is a legal act of violence if and only if someone has committed a crime. CEOs, while immoral, do not necessarily break laws.
And yes, calling for a group of people to be imprisoned can fall under §130. Again, I am not a lawyer but there have been court decisions about this.
Finally, the fact that lemmy.world distributes content advocating for the killing of CEOs could likely fall under this paragraph because the death sentence itself violates human dignity already.
According to the 2nd highest court in Germany that can only be overruled by the constitutional court:
A section of the population - the only one to be considered in the present case - is a group of persons who are distinguishable from the rest of the population on the basis of common external or internal characteristics of a political, national, ethnic, racial, religious, ideological, social, economic, professional or other nature, who are numerically of some significance and thus no longer individually distinguishable.
BGH 3 StR 602/14, decision from 2015-04-14
As a layman, CEOs seem to fit that definition due to their economic and professional characteristic.
This Wikipedia article has an extensive number of court cases and resulting applocations and limitations listed, in case you're interested in learning more. The English version is far less detailed, so try translating the whole site, i.e. through Firefox Translate:
If I were a court of law I would sentence you to snuggle with your shark until you feel comfortable as some sort of exposure therapy.
Try Germany:
§111 (1) StGB:
Anyone who publicly, in a meeting or by disseminating content (Section 11 (3)) incites an unlawful act shall be punished as an instigator (Section 26).
§130 StGB:
(1) Anyone who, in a manner likely to disturb the public peace,
- incites hatred against a national, racial, religious or ethnic group, against parts of the population or against an individual because of his membership of a designated group or part of the population, or incites violence or arbitrary measures, or
- attacks the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously denigrating or defaming a designated group, parts of the population or an individual because of their membership of a designated group or part of the population, shall be liable to a custodial sentence of three months to five years.
(2) A custodial sentence not exceeding three years or a monetary penalty shall be imposed on anyone who
- disseminates or makes available to the public content (Section 11 (3)) or offers, provides or makes available to a person under the age of eighteen content (Section 11 (3)) that a) incites hatred against a group referred to in paragraph 1 number 1, against sections of the population or against an individual because of his or her membership of a group referred to in paragraph 1 number 1 or of a section of the population, b) incites violence or arbitrary measures against persons or groups of persons referred to in letter a), or c) violates the human dignity of persons or groups of persons referred to in letter a) by insulting, maliciously denigrating or defaming them, or
- produces, obtains, supplies, keeps in stock, offers, advertises or undertakes to import or export content referred to in number 1 letters a to c (§ 11 paragraph 3) in order to use it in the sense of number 1 or to enable another person to make such use of it.
I'm fairly certain CEOs could fall under the "designated group" label but I'm not a lawyer. If that is the case, lemmy.world can be held accountable for the spread of content promoting their death.
Yup, I've had to really search for good offers in the past over here but there's still a couple of decent one's around.
For example:
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0CF5XVHMS/
16 TB @ 200€ with [probably] cheap shipping + you can add an extended warranty of up to 4 years for an additional 6€. No clue whether the extended warranty covers hard drive failure, though it seems like it should.
Refurbished 16TB+ HDDs are around that price range.
If you want a new one its sadly twice as expensive.
They won't because this doesn't refer to security updates, which GrapheneOS bases their support on.
So it's great for people who do not have GrapheneOS, but for us that do nothing changes.
No you don't??
Just use an on-screen keyboard smh