Like yeah, it's not a great sign - partly because it's easy for people like you to intentionally misinterpret - but it's pretty clear it's saying that the Israeli killing of 1.5% of the population of Gaza, and displacement of 85% is a genocide.
people turn to angry politics and alternative narratives when rotting institutions refuse to show them a future worth believing in. Yes, there are crazy, evil people in this world, but they only get a foothold when the sensible ones stop giving a shit.
If you're whistleblowing with information not otherwise in the public domain, I'd suggest contacting wikileaks or a trustworthy independent media outlet.
The Guardian, for example, has the securedrop platform at theguardian.securedrop.tor.onion.
If you just have an opinion to express, the local authority probably isn't really that interested in trying to compromise the encryption on your web traffic, unless they're extremely authoritarian. A standard VPN and a burner account should be sufficient to keep your anonymity.
Unless you're trying to mask your identity from your ISP, instance or government, I don't really see how tor is useful here, given that you're presumably posting on the clearweb anyway.
It's hard to give specific useful advice, because you're so vague about what you're trying to post, and who you want anonymity from. If it's just other users on lemmy, don't bother using tor, just create a burner account and access it normally via the web.
Unsurprisingly, instances aren't super keen on letting users access their platform via tor since it's an effective method of ban evasion, and thus people will mostly be using it to post awful things they didn't want in the first place.
Milei is a POS, but Argentina would be a valuable addition to NATO, and hopefully set a precedent for accepting nations outside of Europe/North America. NATO rules would need an update though, I believe, since afaik they only cover territory in a limited geographical region, which I think Argentina may not be within?
Would the territorial dispute with the UK over the Falklands not be a prohibiting factor, though? Perhaps the low practical value of the Falklands would be outweighed by the benefits of NATO membership. It would be a nice win if this resolved that dispute.
This is a bit misleading, though, Taiwan doesn't want to be recognised as a nation, it wants to be recognised as the one legitimate government of China.
And for bonus points, it's basically just a list of every possible approach, starting with diplomatic approaches at the top:
diplomacy
military intervention
regime change
doing nothing at all
It's "all going to plan" in the same way "guessing all 52 cards in the deck until one of them is right" is a magic trick
Actually given your comment, it's more like someone else listing all the cards until it's right, and then just saying "tada" when they say the right one
I believe I understand what they're proposing, as the same as your interpretation.
But my point is that whichever way you cut it, it's really not a viable solution in practice. It's lovely to imagine a country where Palestinians and Israelis live together in peace and harmony. But in practice, there's no form of such a state that is an acceptable outcome for either side in the short or even medium term. The Israelis see themselves as Israelis and the Palestinians see themselves as Palestinians, and both of them have a right to self determination. Maybe some form of federal/confederate system would be somewhat possible, but the federal powers would have to be so weak that it would really be a unified state only in name.
But it's somewhat viable to find a two-state solution that is somewhat mutually acceptable, and so pursuing that is the best bet for finding a way to end the conflict.
Seems like you've just misinterpreted that sign?
Like yeah, it's not a great sign - partly because it's easy for people like you to intentionally misinterpret - but it's pretty clear it's saying that the Israeli killing of 1.5% of the population of Gaza, and displacement of 85% is a genocide.