Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)XO
Posts
0
Comments
530
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • But it doesn't say you personally are unsafe, it says that the odds that a man chosen at random is unsafe is high enough that women - understandably - fear being left alone with a random stranger to a level at least comparable with being left alone with a bear.

    An enormous number of men fail to understand just how common and how terrifying it is for women to be harassed, assaulted and raped by men. And that is exactly what the bear/man hyperbole is pointing out.

    And the reason people with takes like yours get chewed out for it is because you could do some reflection and consider

    what is this systemic issue, what behaviours might make women around me scared, what can we as a society do to change this, and what can I do to avoid women around me fearing I may be unsafe?

    But instead, they take it as a personal attack, and so respond

    why am I being attacked for someone else's behaviour?

    Edit: here's another example in a similar format to demonstrate how the meme is being misinterpreted, note how your first response wouldn't be "why are you accusing all priests?!"

    "Who would you rather babysit your child, a bear or a Catholic priest?"

  • Ah yes, because there definitely wasn't some other common characteristic to the (not only leftist, as you carefully avoided mentioning) parties that were banned

    Something like, I don't know, supporting the country actively invading Ukraine, perhaps?

  • Source?

    Edit: so I figured I go investigate for myself and by "Ukraine" you mean random citizens involved in what was basically a civil war, the people in the building were using it as a fortress, and blockaded themselves inside, and by "people" you meant Russian separatist insurrectionists, who were firing from the building and throwing Molotov cocktails into the crowd below.

  • You know it's going to be good when you link a tweet from someone who called people paedophiles in retaliation for saying he was racist, got sued for slander and lost!

    There's a difference between "the court didn't determine it was plausible" (ie the court didn't assess its plausibility) and "it isn't plausible"

    So you can't use it as proof that it isn't a genocide, because that's not what she said at all.

    As you say: but nice try, I guess! It's a shame I'm literate!

    Next time, I recommend actually watching your source rather than regurgitating what the racist says 👍