Skip Navigation

Posts
35
Comments
572
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • CSAM? What is CSAM? Is it a rewrite of "scam"?

    Googles...

    Oh no. Oh no no no. Why are people so fucking shit?

  • People in cities have not sustained on growing their own foods for hundreds of years. Refined crops and goods have been machined into the cities ever since the industrial revolution and before that it was farmers that brought their goods to be sold at the markets. The greatest achievement of humanity over other species on the planet is our ability to delegate and cooperate. You grow food, I make tools. Together we thrive.

    Yep, you have a rampant problem with housing and healthcare over there in America-land, I agree. But why is that? Because of massive hoarding of resources. Human essentials and needs are commoditized like a "smart" investment for the ruthless opportunists. Hell, your entire societal system is built around it, and it's spilling into the rest of the world. It's a dog eat dog economy that is hailed like an ideology by useful idiots bought by the elites by the trickling of pocket change. Then the ideology has been turned into a culture of over consumption, again hailed by other useful idiots to convince the regular people that it will give them purpose, fill the hole, numb the pain of the aimless grind for nothing meaningful ever. And who does all of this benefit? Where do all this wealth and all these resources end up that could transform the entire planet for something that benefits all mankind? To the owners of the owners of the owners, and the money that doesn't crawl it's way up is a good investment to keep the system intact.

    But no, let's concentrate on the tools we use and not what they do. Let's focus on the monetary system. Let's get stuck in inflation and regression and unfortunate loopholes "but-what-can-you-do" and tax havens and desired unemployment rates and spoiling of food while people are starving - for the economy. Everything can be explained with the economy, and if you disagree you're clearly uninformed or ignorant don't have enough the smarts.

    People have done the double think and now the economy is no longer the tool, is no longer a representation, but it is the real thing. And more so the current economic system is forever and eternal and unchangeable like the word of God.

    It's funny and sad that people actually believe this is all there is.

  • Because corporate greed and the economic elite around the world hoarding more resources than ever before.

    And we let them.

  • A lottery ticket because it can provide momentarily some fun and excitement while the equivalent of a dollar can not.

    Edit: *five dollars. I'd still pick the lottery ticket because why not.

  • Metal Machine Music.

  • In Sweden, we have a classic joke that Norwegian roundabouts have the sign "Maximum 3 rounds".

  • They are very good for the economic elite and voted to power by idiots that think they'll reap a fraction of the benefits of the economic elite. Also bigots and extremists love the right wing because everything in society will get worse so more people will be uphappy which will in turn feed more xenophobia and more extremism.

  • Treaties is maybe not the right word in English. NATO application for one, American military facilities in Sweden is another.

  • Swede here, in the revolving door of maybe NATO membership. I'd prefer the EU to have our own military union that is affiliated with NATO but isn't devoted to American interests. Unfortunately it seems too late for such considerations with our right wing government signing treaties as fast as they can. Thanks, Putin.

  • Yeah, it's a joke. The white ones are missing the top layer it seems.

  • I remember nurses in white and doctors with a mirror on a headband when I was a kid in the 70s.

  • Plenty of comments here alone dismiss everything about it.

    We, as a seasoned internet nerd community and the gamers amongst us in particular, may have been exposed to edgy and lewd behaviour online since forever, not that it is a good thing.

    It should not be considered normal that it happens everywhere online and it should not be expected that everyone should be as cynical and desensitised as we are.

    But yeah. Assault is the wrong charge. It is sexual harassment. And it should be taken seriously.

  • It is absurd and funny, I agree, but only because it is not representative of what actually happened.

  • Example from the article what it can look like:

    Recalling the experience, Ms Patel told the same programme that she was "surrounded by three to four male-sounding and male-representing avatars, who started sexually harassing me in a verbal sense and then sexually assaulting my avatar".

    She said they had used misogynistic language and "continued to touch my avatar in a way that can only be described as a sexual assault of my avatar".

    So, I guess the appropriate terminology would be sexual harassment of the person by virtual sexual assault on their avatar in the VR space, or something like that.

    I can imagine for an innocent person unprepared for it to be ganged and surrounded by deviants in VR sounds like it could be a proper traumatic experience. I don't think there should be downplaying or normalizing this kind of experience for the sole reason that pervs are to be expected online. There is no reason to sink expectations of society to the lowest uncommon deranged denominator.

  • It sounds ridiculous that they assaulted an avatar. I think it is the wrong take. The avatar is just the medium. The target was obviously the person behind the avatar. It's like saying that threats over text message is assaulting her phone.

  • Indeed I could, but this is the boring job you have the paid employees for rather than putting it on users to ensure a stable version of your product. .

  • Having no memories of last night's after-ski shenanigans but today your mouth tastes like sugary cotton balls of death and everybody in the ski lift is looking at you funny?

  • Yeah, it's totally a fun feature driven project reliant on community efforts despite there is a commercial venture behind it nowadays. The core devs still treat it as their baby hobby project and nobody wants to do the boring job of maintaining a stable branch so it's not going to happen.

    Some while ago I saw another discussion on this topic that was shot down with the opposing arguments that all users have to do is stay up date with the latest version, while also saying that users are at fault for things breaking because they update when a notification tells them that there is a new latest version.

    I think it's arrogant and irresponsible and a ticking time bomb for a big time bug or zero day exploit and not how any serious project should be administered.

    I wish I could have Linus Torvalds give his colorful opinion on this mindset on developing the operating system for peoples homes.