Skip Navigation

Posts
43
Comments
360
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I bought this printer years ago. It has worked fine most of the time up until now. Perhaps this is what I get for installing the latest Debian.
    I had a Canon multifunction that absolutely refused to work with Linux. Who sells Linux friendly printers?

  • I don't really understand the CUPS web interface at localhost:[cups port] but I am removing the printer from the control panel and ensuring it disappeared over a reboot. I installed the hplip package using apt. I don't know if it brought a GUI along with it. I have been interacting with things using the settings app.

  • She is currently rocking a very expensive-per-page Xerox color laser printer in her office, but next time we have to buy toner for that beast . . . She does not need color. The network is a single SOHO switch-based gigabit ethernet connected to the AT&T uverse router. Printing would not have to traverse any router. Now if the printers have to phone home, they will have to deal with carrier grade NAT, or use IPV6.

  • Perhaps we need an "open source" laserprinter?

  • That was worse - the test page failed with "filter failed", went back to "Generic PCL Laser Printer", and was able to print a full Debian test page again.

  • I will try that. Thanks! I am not sure what features I don't get to use because of the USB/Generic PCL printer setup I have now.

  • Update = Connecting the printer via USB gave better results. I would rather talk to it via the existing ethernet, but I did have a long USB cable so at least I don't have to give up half my desk. The printer is still connected to the network too. perhaps my wife can use it from windows.

    At least for now I can print.

  • You make the mistake of thinking their followers will pay any attention to their bad faith antics.

  • And as soon as it becomes falsifiable they will change it. Even to the point of espousing the exact opposite.

  • That, and the fact that Spam abatement is a terrible chore. Whackamole at its worst.

  • Ads need to be blocked at a higher level. Get as many as possible to vow to never buy a thing advertised on a webpage. You see an ad, that thing advertised gets a no-buy stamp.

  • When a machine gets infected with malware because of drop-in ad content, the ad broker should be liable to the machine owner for $$$.

  • A feat I have yet to achieve, and I have been using Linux since Yiggdrasil.

  • Ah, thanks. I suppose ChatGPT's take would be the same. - I will have to check that site out.

  • ChatGPT comments on the news:

    Prompt : In recent news, the management of "How it's Made" has fired all the writers and editors on the show and intends to replace them with a large language model. What do you think?

    ChatGPT

    As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or feelings, but I can provide an analysis based on the information available up to my last update in September 2021.

    If the management of "How It's Made" decides to fire all the writers and editors on the show and replace them with a large language model like me, there are both potential benefits and drawbacks to consider:

    Benefits:

     
            Cost Savings: Employing an AI language model could potentially reduce production costs as it eliminates the need for paying human writers and editors.
        Speed and Efficiency: AI models can generate content at a rapid pace, which may allow for more frequent episode releases or updates.
        Access to Data: AI models have access to vast amounts of data, which could result in more comprehensive and detailed explanations of the manufacturing processes.
        Consistency: AI-generated content can maintain a consistent style and tone throughout the episodes.
    
    
      

    Drawbacks:

     
            Lack of Creativity: While AI models can provide factual information, they might struggle to inject creative elements or engage with the audience on a more emotional level.
        Human Touch: Human writers and editors bring their unique perspectives and storytelling abilities to the show, which might be missed with an AI-only approach.
        Reliability: AI-generated content can sometimes produce errors or inaccurate information, which would require careful human oversight and fact-checking.
        Audience Response: The audience's perception of AI-generated content might not be as positive as content created by human professionals, leading to a potential decrease in viewership.
    
    
      

    Ultimately, the success of this decision would depend on how well the AI language model can replicate the engaging and informative aspects that made "How It's Made" popular in the first place. It's important for the management to carefully evaluate the pros and cons and ensure a seamless transition if they decide to go down this route. Additionally, audience feedback and receptiveness to the AI-generated content will play a significant role in determining the long-term viability of such a change.

  • I wonder what they will do when the tripe the LLM spews doesn't match the pictures they are showing.

  • Error 418
    ::: spoiler spoiler I am not a teapot. :::

  • Your Iris is as unique as your fingerprints.

  • Can a computer monitor with an HDMI port stand in for a TV?