vovchik_ilich [he/him] @ vovchik_ilich @hexbear.net

Posts

0

Comments

24

Joined

11 mo. ago

Sorry, are you implying that, out of all media, WaPo is spreading Russian propaganda?!

Don't even need to watch the video to remember exactly how it goes, absolute banger

MSI 4GB version of GTX970. Upgraded a few years ago to an RX6800 and I'm stoked about both GPUs tbh

A better question then would be "what percentage of people doesn't conform to your ethnonationalist idea of local".

More like scrotum master, LMAO GOTTEM

I'm not saying we should exclude any tools, I'm just skeptical about the trend of calling everything AI, attributing all computational advances to AI, and jumping into the bandwagon of businesses trying to oversell any and all computating as AI.

The very first link shows that this is incremental benefit that's been taking place since 2010. Computational tools are useful, but you're providing mostly links of algorithms/learning models to sort pictures for medical purposes and diagnosis (useful and cool), and saying that somehow that means fusion will be solved by AI

Please give me the examples

So, are there any results of technological achievements from any AI models that show a trend towards increasing solving of scientific and technical problems?

By fusion, what do you mean?

Germany is already taking the wrong side of history.

Always has been

What other type of current AI claims problem-solving capabilities?

No, I haven't seen any major technological breakthroughs coming from language models, other than language models themselves. Have you?

Wait, you think fusion will be developed thanks to AI?

The almost-circle thingy is one side, which is touching the two straight lines, which are joined by another circular segment at the rightmost part. That makes four sides.

I'm more of a charmander guy

We're already there, there's no need for this hypothetical. We've reached the point where we have trademarked plants, and natural cross-pollination with neighbouring fields has led to fines to farmers because they're technically growing someone else's intellectual property plant.

Vaccines and drugs whose research is paid for with public funds are copyrighted and poorer nations are forbidden from obtaining them at reasonable prices.

Vanguard technologies like FPGAs are seeing a rise in later years not because the concept is new, but because 40-year-old key patents of the technology started to expire and this allowed third parties to improve on the technology, and increase its availability and affordability.

Time and time again, software and hardware designed and published with open source but licensed copyright (or copyleft) are blatantly copied and modified without permission by big tech, without any credit or compensation to the original author, in complete violation of the license terms, and nothing ever happens because they have better lawyers than the small open source people.

AI models are unlawfully trained illegally with immense amounts of copyrighted material, and then substitute artists with real understanding of the art.

No need to make up hypotheticals for a society in which this already happens

No. Al-Jazeera published a report that the electronic devices that exploded had high explosives embedded, and I'm not in a target country

[...] is a provocation worthy of military invasion?

See, that's an entirely different statement. Threatening to join Russia's geopolitical rival's military alliance while bordering Russia, is provocation. The acts in Donbas since 2014 are provocation. Is it "worthy of military invasion"? I don't believe so. The proto-fascist Russian government is clearly not acting entirely out of pure will and self defense, and I'll be the last to defend it since I have loved ones directly suffering under that government. But it's important to frame things correctly, and yes, threatening to join NATO while bordering Russia is a huge provocation.

Particularly, NATO has no history of defensiveness (as far as I know it has never intervened for the defensive purposes it's supposed to uphold), but it has a history of offensiveness. Yugoslavia and Libya can both attest to that, and extra-officially (technically not NATO interventions even if many NATO members participated one way or another), countries such as Iraq can also attest. The case of Iraq is a perfect example of what unprovoked invasion in modern times is, and we are still forced to see libs fall heads over heels for a fucking Dick Satan Cheney endorsement to Kamala "most lethal army in the world" Harris.

So, yes, when a country bordering you chooses to join a historically aggressive military alliance that openly challenges you, that's huge provocation. And it's important to state so when we talk about the war in Ukraine.

completely unprovoked

considering joining NATO

Those two statements are in the same phrase... My god