Still can't understand the point of it. Like, is the state ordering that civilians must be defenseless in the face of crime, for example? But yeah in general it just sounds like the usual "I am the Senate" fascist kind of takeover and control of power.
We have NO issues with the people at db0 - we are just looking out for ourselves in a ‘better safe than sorry’ fashion while we find out more. As mentioned in the OP we would like to unblock as soon as we know we can not get in any legal trouble.
Words are empty, offers are void in Nebraska. You already took steps against people who simply mostly discuss piracy. What concrete steps can you take now to show that you'd actually unblock "as soon as we know"?
en palabras de mi profe “El sujeto sano es el que produce”
Ojo que esta postura es una postura que enseñan universidades cuyos programas son dictados por un mercado capitalista. Es en el interés de las personas con profesión de psicólogo que sus pacientes no cuestionen el status quo.
Hay un comic muy bueno de eso con un sujeto acostado en el sofá del psicólogo y le dice onda "Sabe, no puedo dejar de pensar en la injusticia laboral" y el psicólogo le dice onda "Te daré unas pastillas para que se te pase".
Ahora, quién es exactamente el sujeto sano, yo diría que el que hace trabajo o servicio comunitario, pero allá yo.
Gamifying the editing of other people's posts and editing semantics of content after-the-fact
Yeahhhhhh no, I think you just suggested StackOverflow without taking even a look at the recent or not recent discussions on how it behaves (eg.: the moderator strike) or why.
I think there are ways this could be kept in check, but basically you'd be providing an incentive towards just going around and adding tags for content nilly-willy, potentially leading to something very similar to SO's "closed as duplicate" (duplicate is on a completely different language / software stack / problem domain) issue.
It also means the content is "lost" from all instances if the original server goes down, which altogether with the need to cache the key to continue to provide the service basically means you've just implemented DRM on top of Fedi.
Still can't understand the point of it. Like, is the state ordering that civilians must be defenseless in the face of crime, for example? But yeah in general it just sounds like the usual "I am the Senate" fascist kind of takeover and control of power.