Venia Silente @ veniasilente @lemm.ee

Hi I'm a non-AI person, 100% human or at least furry. Also ''venia_sil'' on

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

616

Joined

2 yr. ago

punishing people for downvoting AI slop

Now that would be quite the turn... Downvoting AI slop is the basic human decency I'd expect from Lemmy.

So basically they balked, went for a "more of the same", then balked off that and went back? Can't imagine why.

Then again XMPP / Jabber is so much easier to host, you can do it in the cheapest Linode VPS, yet communities don't use it either.

isolate your identity! avoid leaks! avoid payments! don't use tracking! avoid analytics!

come join us in our Discord!

...something... does not compute.

They didn't even hand me a uniform or a qt cap, and they work with Node.js despite several warnings; I ain't representing shit.

Congrats on keeping your cat active and engaged for 11 years!

Why don't you speak what you truly believe instead of copy-pasting the same gaslighting everywhere? We already made you, anyway.

Ok, but I would say that these concerns are all small potatoes compared to the potential for the general public gaining the ability to query a system with synthesized expert knowledge obtained from scraping all academically relevant documents.

If any of that was actually true, yeah. But it's not, it can't be, and it won't be.

As with all world-changing technology, "the general public" will never truly obtain its power, not until it has been well squeezed by the elites for gains. Not only that, "the general public" obtaining this power would be devastating on the simple physical principle that this kind of technology depends on ruining the ecology. And this whole "synthethized expert knowledge".... man, that's three words that mean absolutely nothing when chained together because it's all illusion: it's not actual knowledge, it's not expert, and it's not even synthetized, at best it's emulated. It's all a tangle of lies and make-believes sold on bulk with zero accountability.

But sure, nice dream. I want a Lamborghini, too.

If you work for a company, you’re a representative of that company.

I'm not. Corporate is paying for my work (and barely, at that, given current rates), not for my ethics or for my ethical standing before other people who might not work at the company. If you believe otherwise, you might have been brainwashed by corporate-paid education.

So, lemme get this straight: Wikipedia is being censored (worldwide, might I add) because a party complains that they are reported of as being accused of a thing, or because of the thing itself?

Well, given the kind of company, it's not like you'd obtain a consent if you asked. They're too busy getting that Israeli money.

This puts a whole new spin on "running out of IPv4".

Frankly, one of the big reasons why I like the Fediverse is that you don't have to depend on the source keeping up their stuff - we get our own copies. That includes both the text (the posts) and the media (the images), and to me, that's one third of the point of the entire thing. If I wanted an image that can only be seen at the dumpster cage that is Twitter, I'd go over there shrug and move on.

Of course that's not always workable because storage is (despite everything) not cheap, medias grow large (I can eg.: understand saving pictures, but heaven forbid trying to save a video) and there's still not a good way to deal with """problematic""" storage. So, my recommendation and expectation would be something that functions like Option 2: Proxying Images. Basically, we download our own copy but only store it "while it matters".

How to Supplement Options

Now, maybe some proposals I would lift to have their feasibility studied. Any combination of one or more of these could, if implemented, help in enhancing or even supplantting the chosen method for storing remote media. I personally see them more as a means to enhance Option 2.

• Only save copies of images (perpetual or proxy) that are below certain thresholds: file size, resolution, trusted hosts, etc... Sure, that still means you have to download every image at least once to evaluate it, but at least we get some sort of automated guarantee that for "easy" stuff, we won't be filing more connections than necessary. The big win of this option is that lemm.ee is not paying for the larger resource cost of fetching larger images after their post is made. I'm guessing the main drawback would be the bikeshedding required to decide which images get saved locally.
• Related option to the above: only save (perpetual) thumbnails or smallened versions of images, never the real ones. Would pretty much instantly cover the case of eg.: most memes. The big drawback I can see to this is managing those images for deletions would be harder unless a Lemmy instance can keep a searchable map of hashes from each image to their thumbnail and vice versa.
• Require that any image is linked from an imagehost or filehost that is trustable for durability. Big drawback: notoriously more effort (and potential loss of privacy) for users means this actually disincentivizes posting rich content.
• Pool up resources and get some cooperative work going with some other instance(s) to set up a shared proxy agent that downloads the images for us, so that lemm.ee doesn't have to host the images but can have the clients fetch them without sacrificing privacy. I feel this one incentivizes posting rich content because you can get some level of assurance that it'll remain available and be "cheap" to access from across the Fediverse, but requires more instances to chip in.
• Images? Pfff. Text is where it's at.

Establishing an continuing a precedent is important.

Maybe this is why Evil Overlords have cats? So that even if the hero manages to best the human, they won't be able to get to the Abort Nukes button before T - 00:00 because the cat is hunched on top.

Now that you mention indie games, I think it's important to distinguish intents and showcase how publishers are shooting themselves in the foot.

Someone who pirated an indie game (why tho?) and liked it, is more likely to pay for it because indie publishers also provide better medium to pay for the actual software, or contribute to the actual developer, with fewer middlemen and rent-seekers. If someone pirated an AAA game and liked it and wanted to buy it, their options are still limited due to one of the main reasons of having pirated the game in the first place. At prices of, like, US$ 60 lol, hey'd have to wait until a Steam supersale or smth...

They could steal your personal data without you knowing.

Hah! Like the "legal" services are much better than that!

So the cat distribution system also works when the cat then goes off... interesing!

but feel the punishment does not fit the crime.

Agree. Was too soft. She went in and charged to vandalize and attack asylum seekers. Maybe some exile will teach her some empathy on how those people were already feeling.

Technically the media conglomerates should be the ones to be sued: they provide material to be pirated in the first place!

She's well seated on the barstool and not on the counter. I'll allow it! o3o