Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TW
Posts
3
Comments
224
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Ik ben laatst overgestapt maar om dat goed te regelen, ook met creditcards, was ik wel een een dagje of 1.5 zoet + nu nog allemaal lopende zaken over hypotheek, levensverzekering etc. die je niet (gemakkelijk) digitaal kunt wijzigen en mondjesmaat afgevinkt kunnen worden.

    Blij dat ik het heb gedaan, maar ik had het simpeler verwacht.

  • No you're not, but to dismiss that your actions still have influence on other people/systems is short-sighted.

    Once more, it's fine if you eat meat. You don't have to consciously manage other people's expectations. But just know that you automatically do. Buying meat is supporting the future production of meat, that's all.

  • They would stop doing it commercially. You are free to kill a pig and eat it, so are other people. Or trade it, but that's again economics.

    Mass production of meat is a luxury that would never have this scale if people had to find, raise and slaughter pigs themselves.

    You supporting mass production of meat is paying to raise, kill and consume pigs. Which is still fine in our society, just see it as it is.

  • Yes, but they only pay those people if they expect to make a profit by selling the end product to you. You are one of the people who make it worthwhile to set up a chain of payments like that.

    If they do not expect you (or other people) to buy the meat, they won't pay those people to raise / kill the pigs.

    Whether it's you this time or someone else doesn't matter. As long as there is a demand by end consumers they will continue. If no-one buys it they stop, it's that simple.

    You're part of the group that enables this dynamic and your money goes to paying those people. It's fine if you like meat, just don't deny this basic logic.

  • They wouldn't kill, or even raise the pig if they didn't count on the money down the chain. We indirectly but surely pay for pigs to be created / killed, for our consumption.

    It's fine if you don't care about that or accept it as your standards, that's your choice and fair in our current social context. Just realize the economics behind it.

  • I think it has something to do with needing more oxygen, just like doing push-ups will help and so will running around or even just stopping your breathing for ~30 seconds. Your body will eventually go into a higher alert state.

    It just helps for a short bit though, when you relax your nasal passage does too and blocks all again.

  • Hun beperking speelt mee met dat ze het niet overzien; alles werkt tegen en dan is de boeman-benoemer al snel een opluchting. Saillant detail is dat ze zelf al jaren teren op steun van de overheid; daar is Wilders in hun geval wat minder van.

  • Ik weet het niet, zeker gezien Wilders voor minderheden (geestelijke beperking in dit geval) niet echt veel goeds op het programma heeft. Maar het zal de aandoening zijn.. jammer dat die nu impact heeft op ons hele land.

  • Many countries are non-countries with this viewpoint. Through all of humanity land was taken over and over. Only the real first pioneers on new land could perhaps claim the boundaries (which in itself is a weird concept). We have no records on that in deep history.

  • Well, it depends on your bubble I guess. But personally I'd say it's underrated and overrated at the same time, but mostly underrated.

    It depends on your expectations and way of usage in your toolbox I'd say. It keeps surprising me weekly how fast progress is. But we get used to it perhaps.

  • Desktop runs great, but Firefox on Android seems to be noticeably buggy here and there sadly. I still use it, but I can imagine that might drive people out of the ecosystem.

    Many people get used to the synchronization of their passwords / bookmarks cross-channel. More advanced users have a separate password management for this I'd figure, but that's not the default for 90% I'd guess.

  • You're willingly confirming something you rate as sensitive, trying to bring more credibility to it by being an extra shout and referencing a virtually unverifiable needle in a haystack 'authority' as Google, but find the sensitivity a reason for not sharing your information.

    How can you reason like this?

  • Only let the new "last month" have one extra day would fix this. That would break the Weekdays, but perhaps that's not so bad as recurring events like birthdays and holidays are then not always destined per se to be on the same weekday.