Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TS
turbo_snail @ turbo_snail @lemmy.world
Posts
0
Comments
5
Joined
2 yr. ago

Chinese scientists claim record smashing quantum computing breakthrough

Jump

  • The only real problem I am aware of is breaking some types of public key encryption. Which is kinda bad because post quantum encryption is still in its infancy.

    • zsh or fish for an intermediate Linux user?

    Jump

  • Thank you. Will take a look as well.

    • zsh or fish for an intermediate Linux user?

    Jump

  • Thanks for pointing me at tide. I always used the pure prompt but tide looks like pure on steroids.

    • It's so nice to see them all growing, but this is just the truth, sorry.

    Jump

  • Thank you for your answer. I will read the article you linked.

    I initially was just very irritated by your comment because it sounded like closed source is more secure in general.

    Have a nice evening too.

    • It's so nice to see them all growing, but this is just the truth, sorry.

    Jump

  • Sync is popular because its closed source makes it harder to break the security aspect if you don't have all the access to source code.

    Do I understand correctly that you mean, that closed source makes something more secure?

    I believe that open source can be more secure because:

    • More people looked at the source code thus more bugs have been discovered.
    • Bad actors will get a hold of your code anyways. Especially mobile apps should be easy to reverse engineer.
    • Intentional backdoors are easier to hide in closed source applications.

    There might be more arguments, but I think you get the point.