triptrapper @ triptrapper @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

393

Joined

2 yr. ago

In the western scientific model, this is how we differentiate truths from anecdotes and assumptions. Not sure why this needs to be repeated in every thread about the results of research.

Jason Momoa. Can't act, plays every character the same, and can't seem to keep himself from smirking in every moment of screentime.

Also Paul Dano. Someone else mentioned Leo's "imposter syndrome" and I would apply that to Dano also. I can't tell if he's acting too much or not enough, but he always feels out of place.

I'm with you. It's like going to college after being homeschooled your whole life. Of course you need to know logistical things like how to submit homework, but those are easy answers to find. You also need to know how the other kids talk and what they're talking about. It's hard being out of the loop in regular conversations.

Those look like a bunch of photocopies, like someone who's never been to a protest but wants the cops to think he's a protestor. Ya know, by bringing 100 paper photocopies of the name of the protest, like a protestor would.

People tend to get activated once they feel they're personally being threatened. Voter suppression notwithstanding, I'm sure there are plenty of people who couldn't be bothered to vote but could definitely be bothered to physically defend themselves and their neighbors.

I agree that this is a sickening amount of e-waste, and companies should be responsible for processing/recycling their own waste, but what's the alternative in this case? Mail the faulty batteries back to Anker?

He's not giving up on politics, just the DNC. Which could turn out to be exactly the right move.

Now do pharmacies!

To be clear, I voted for Harris, and I implored everyone I know to vote for Harris, for exactly the reasons you mentioned. I will always vote for the farthest-left candidate in the general, full-stop. I'm not arguing that both sides are the same, or that Harris wouldn't have been a better choice for 100 reasons outside of the genocide issue. I'm arguing that Harris gave no indication that she would defend Palestine or even recognize the genocide at all. She might well have done those things, but she didn't campaign on that, so I don't know why anyone is defending her on the issue. Establishment Dems can't seem to get it through their heads that progressive policies are popular, so we keep getting general elections between an absolute monster and a neolib Dem saying, "Vote for me or you'll get the monster!" That might be the reality, but it's not a platform.

I live in a blue state, and I had people around me arguing that whether they voted third-party or didn't vote at all, they would be able to sleep at night knowing that A. they didn't vote for genocide and B. the state would go blue anyway. I don't agree with that position at all. I want third parties to be represented in the US, but that starts at the local level and in the primaries. By the general election it's too late and we realistically have two options. I also believe that shutting down any criticism of the Dem candidate (e.g. a now-banned user told me to kill myself) is a good way to alienate people and discourage them from engaging with the process at all. The right has banned nuance from their discourse, and I refuse to allow the same thing to happen around me.

1 million upvotes for you. "Hope you're happy Trump got elected. Palestine is doing great now" etc. is such a tired cliche at this point. I'm astonished that it gets upvoted every. single. time. Harris literally said she wouldn't do anything different from Biden. She would have allowed/financed the genocide all the same, but she'd be calling the "tragic loss of life" a "very complex issue." I have no idea where this fantasy comes from that she would suddenly be the hero who stands up to Israel.

You sound like an expert in doing nothing.

Nation Could Have Sworn Russell Brand Was Already Convicted Sex Offender -The Onion

I appreciate you recognizing the blunder, and you couldn't have picked a more obscure reference.

What?

As a thus-far-monogamous person, my understanding of ENM is that the point isn't to be easier, but to respect each person's right to engage in relationships however feels right to them. One benefit I see is that for ENM to be ethical it requires open communication. It forces conversations about consent, satisfaction, curiosity, jealousy, priority, etc. All of those issues exist in monogamous relationships, but we're allowed to avoid talking about them by saying for example, "It doesn't matter if I feel jealous because the contract says we won't have other relationships."

Yes.

I'm sure she was a model Christian before Trump got to her.

There are valid reasons why someone wouldn't want to stick around and talk to the cops. They could be undocumented, they could have priors, or they could (justifiably) be worried that the cops might consider them a suspect when they're not.

When Jacob Wetterling went missing, a guy who lived close to the crime scene publicly asked why the sheriff's department never interviewed him. They responded by naming his as a person of interest and harassing him for 27 years until they arrested the actual perpetrator.

Do you have a link? I think it's important to witness stuff like this.

This is absolutely inhuman.