Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TR
Posts
1
Comments
26
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Given their post on mastodon saying they won’t defederate, I would bet money they took that meeting and signed an NDA.

    Maybe they even are getting some funding out of it.

    This is all speculation of course, but if they don’t deny it then I think it’s pretty likely.

  • What you’ll likely see is the button links to a centralized service that sends you to the Lemmy instance you are logged into

    So the button would never link directly to any Lemmy instance but some central server that sends you to your own instance.

    Who would run that server? Probably the same guys who develop these button integrations.

  • I showed my friend all of the privacy problems with threads and his response was ‘I don’t care, they already have everything anyway’.

    I told another friend and their response was ‘I don’t care if they have my data, it’s not much use to them and it doesn’t have any effect on me’

    The world is hopeless.

  • This is the true final blow to third party apps.

    I noticed they did something similar to the mobile website. Even with appropriate content blockers there’s absolutely no way you can see sexually explicit content on mobile without their app.

  • I feel like the EEE attack is inevitable at this point.

    Why else would they even be willing to federate?

    They saw the threat that decentralized non-profit social media is and want to kill it before it has a chance.

    All Lemmy servers and especially the largest ones need to defederate from it immediately.

  • It’s crazy how some of the communications from their CEO has been.

    He clearly thinks he owns all the content on the platform and even called the third party app users ‘freeloaders’ when a ton of them were top contributors to the platform.

  • Halo was a legit competitor to cod just past a decade ago.

    Now you can’t even compare them because COD is bigger than ever while halo is a shadow of its former self.

    Infinite really could have been a partial comeback for halo if they had a steady stream of content after launch, but somehow they added even less than most non-live service games.

  • In a nutshell: corporate greed. The only part of the game that was live service was the paid cosmetics.

    At launch, their entire idea of more ‘content’ was just visual cosmetics. If you look at their communications at the time it will all make sense.

    They constantly referred to an internal ‘live service’ team separate from the rest of the game, and that team was effectively the ‘cosmetics team’.

    People talk about contractors, but this was the real problem. They thought they could get away with barely adding any real content and selling tons of cosmetics.