It's basically bots vs bots vs admins... at least that is what happened when I logged in earlier today and joined some people trying (I'm not proud of it) to make the Counter Strike guy have a penis.
I get a lot of pleasure, even laughing by myself hysterically, when I help "Deep Rock" become "Deer Cock", when I help make "Connecting" into "Cumnecting", and when with one little pixel I make "Factorio" into a slur...
Ok. I understand what you are saying, and there might be historical reasons for the founders of Rocky to believe they can defend better against a takeover by being a PBC. I don't know if that's true, I'm not a lawyer. The thing is that if an organization can legally make a profit, I don't trust that it does not. I'm not trying to insult Greg Kurtzner, I don't know him. But I wouldn't need to trust him if they had made a non-profit.
And sure, Alma exists because of funding from corporate interests, but so does the Linux kernel, and GNOME, and probably a large percentage of free software. That's the point of copyleft, when companies improve free software it remains free.
Personally I've never used RHEL, CentOS, Rocky Linux, or AlmaLinux. I was just curious why Fermilab and CERN chose Alma instead of Rocky, which I had heard about more. I found out and I believe they did the right thing, hence the headline. I have no fucking agenda. (maybe you do)
PS: The whole thing, including this post, assumes that Alma and Rocky have the same goal (which apparently is no longer true), and that non-profits can make no money (which... WTF IKEA).
41>10>5
GNOME is clearly the best