trackcharlie @ trackcharlie @lemmynsfw.com

Posts

0

Comments

481

Joined

2 yr. ago

Ah, so you don't actually care about the research, the statistics or the facts, you would prefer to try and turn this into a discussion about personal problems than facts.

I've no interest given you are likely not in a STEM education or profession and given your notes here, likely wouldn't make it far even if you tried.

Objective interest and observation is vastly more important than the individual, and instead of approaching it from a statistical and facts based approach you're attempting to twist what I've said into some kind of rhetorical attack on women.

I guess it would make you feel better to believe I'm a man that hates women, but, tragically for you, I have XX chromosomes so your incompetent attempt to present me as the problem in this scenario falls short, especially considering I have been in STEM for the past 20 years both as a student and now a professional academic.

Your personal problems with the materials are ultimately immaterial when compared to the concerns I laid out.

I assume next you'll start going "the jews are keeping women down"? Or maybe "the patriarchy is the problem, lets ignore the fact women on average choose caring professions over STEM professions".

At no point did I say the abuse and discrimination wasn't there, I specifically noted that more research is required to figure out "why" it is there, and not pretend like it's just "white men keeping women down".

I understand nuance can be hard, but if you read enough books you'll get it eventually, I promise.

Making wide claims on entire groups based on inferential data is inherently unprofessional. They didn't stop at observing they're making claims without evidence to back it up.

How one person feels about something does not automatically mean that someone was intentionally or even unintentionally hurting them.

That is the issue at heart here.

I stopped using google search around 2018. The reason? Their ads were serving literal virus-infected links of scams that pretend to be real companies.

Nothing has changed since.

Duckduckgo for life I guess

God damn I love Larian studios.

We cannot do effective corollary research if groups are not independently researched with their own data, a 'minimum impact' is still an impact, one which can be used to portray a larger or smaller effect than there is between the actual groups being compared against, especially when there's a distinct call of 'white males' being a problem with no determination of class, culture or variance of religious vs non religious.

People are not blocks, they don't vote as blocks they don't work as blocks and they most assuredly do not behave as blocks. It's important to specify, separate, and effectively research each group and sub group in order to determine the veracity rather than just applying a claim to a useful and popular current enemy, e.g. 'white male'.

Did you read what I wrote or just immediately respond the second I said 'non binary'? Also the fact you're making this statement also indicates you didn't read the source material at all.

I said, in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, that they classified non binary people as women.

Your clear lack of reading comprehension is absolutely not my fault.

I did specifically note the word "theory" when I posited my assertion.

Additionally the book is called "Epstein: Dead men tell no tales" and I can't make a 100% confirmation that the books integrity has been maintained as I read a translated version (overview here: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/48720807-epstein), the overview presented by the book is, in my opinion, extremely watered down and appears to have been censored, either in context or content, to provide a minimally invasive view of what happens behind closed doors.

The book could be used as a foray into questioning authority, but not as a reason to riot or scream, more as a thought provoking and reflecting work to allow others to look more seriously at those they've allowed into power.

It's not as though it's terribly 'eye opening' as I've worked with various governments and government related organizations so not a lot phazes me any more, but it isn't something I would recommend against reading.

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200106-jeffrey-epstein-was-blackmailing-politicians-for-israels-mossad-new-book-claims/

https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/23/long-before-epstein-sex-traffickers-spy-agencies/

https://www.mintpressnews.com/shocking-origins-jeffrey-epstein-blackmail-roy-cohn/260621/

https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/

the following aren't directly related to epstein, but just evidence of what's happened in history: https://www.activistpost.com/2017/07/largest-sex-trafficking-ring-western-us-busted-children-openly-sold-plain-sight.html

https://gizadeathstar.com/2016/10/arrests-us-sex-trafficking-ring-leaders/

https://humansbefree.com/2019/10/is-the-mormon-church-behind-a-worldwide-child-sex-trafficking-ring-operating-out-of-arizona.html

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200106-jeffrey-epstein-was-blackmailing-politicians-for-israels-mossad-new-book-claims/

https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/23/long-before-epstein-sex-traffickers-spy-agencies/

https://www.mintpressnews.com/shocking-origins-jeffrey-epstein-blackmail-roy-cohn/260621/

https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/

the following aren't directly related to epstein, but just evidence of what's happened in history: https://www.activistpost.com/2017/07/largest-sex-trafficking-ring-western-us-busted-children-openly-sold-plain-sight.html

https://gizadeathstar.com/2016/10/arrests-us-sex-trafficking-ring-leaders/

https://humansbefree.com/2019/10/is-the-mormon-church-behind-a-worldwide-child-sex-trafficking-ring-operating-out-of-arizona.html

Yea, and I'm making the case that we're heading back there or worse, given the macroeconomic outlook and the overall failing of the regulatory bodies responsible for the banking industries globally.

Yes, I'm sure the complete breakdown of government and banking institutions is going to maintain a reality just as good or better than the 1800's.

They're grouping non-binary people as female and pretending like this isn't a problem for presenting a statistical analysis?

Who the fuck gave the go ahead for doing this research?

There should be separate reports on non-binary discrimination and female discrimination not combining the two and labeling them women. (in case you're unaware, males and females can both be non-binary so grouping non binary people from either sex into "women" completely de-legitimizes the research)

Completely unprofessional.

https://www.stemwomen.com/women-in-stem-statistics-progress-and-challenges#:~:text=Women%20in%20STEM%20statistics%20%E2%80%93%20Conclusion&text=Overall%2C%20the%20percentage%20of%20female,with%20women%20making%20up%2026%25.

Surprising no one.

Google removed "don't be evil" for the same reason

I'll add more to the theory: Given the number of times epstein met with the former prime minister of isreal in his personal home stateside (and specifically never at the island), it's extremely likely that the reason epstein was killed is because he was working with the CIA and Mossad to run a blackmail ring of the richest and most influential people in the world.

Boomers are the largest private owners of homes, even more than actual corporations that are actively buying and raising housing prices in order to pad their books.

The only way out of this is a financial collapse and that will end up killing millions before the market actually reaches a reasonable price and rate. I don't want this but this seems to be the direction the current macroeconomic conditions are heading.

2024-2028 are going to be some of the most shitty years in human history

I think the core here is that the MIC just wants to sell weapons and it doesn't really matter who or where the ammunition use happens on or with , but that ammo is used and more ammo is bought.

What I meant by my comment is that they aren't 'picking sides' so much as making sure that oversight isn't enforced so arms sales can continue unimpeded.

Nothing has changed other than the government killing trumps 'good friend' epstein to hide his client list

You're either selling a service or a product, you don't get to lay claim to both, and you don't get to walk with peoples money by using linguistic tricks

Remember kids, if buying isn't owning, piracy isn't theft.

They voted for a rapist last time, and the time before, why would that stop them now? These allegations aren't new, and we've known since epstein was caught that Trump frequented the lolita express, and trump himself said epstein was a 'good friend'.

Why would that change any of these peoples minds now? They've had ample time to educate themselves, if ever they wanted to, and I doubt they're voting based on trump anyway as much as 'muh elephant better than ur donkey'.