tomi000 @ tomi000 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

953

Joined

2 yr. ago

Not my experience but nice meme^^

Like the other commenter said its meant to be interpreted in base10.

You could also just take 0.01001100011100001111.... as an example

I think they meant the design

If someone doesnt like your post they are 'living a life of rage'? I need some of that copium, whered you get it?

Is that Mr Beast?

If it works, it works. Not sure what level of math and physics we are talking about here, but university mathematics usually doesnt have "problems" in the common sense. Sure, there are going to be questions on the exam which you can solve using the theory or by remembering similar questions. But, upcoming topics are going to heavily rely on the theory, not on the applied methods for problem-solving. So you might start having problems there. But again, if your system still works for that, who cares.

Also, if you are aiming to become a Doctor / Professor / stay at university, youre going to need to remember the theory. Pretty sure there wont be a way around it.

This isnt reddit, people cant take jokes here /s

Um, sure.

Not sure how you interpreted my comment as criticism, but it wasnt. Nevertheless, there is no comparable alternative, so unfortunateIy cant "do so".

I dont think its about availability, more about the convenience of having everything in one place and especially the rating system (which of course only works if you have a huge customer base and is also being exploited so not really a plus for Amazon anymore)

Of course it is, but why does convenience have to be built on exploitation? I would gladly pay higher prices for an ethical alternative.

Level scaling is usually used to make development easier, so making it optional would require the extra work to come up with appropriate enemy strength and the eoptional scaling effect on top.

Enjoying their freedom to be enslaved, as long as its freedom.

I have a monthly recurring donation to the GiveWell Top Charities fund. GiveWell ranks charities by efficiency (i.e. impact per dollar) and distributes the funds donations to the most effective ones. Those include fighting malaria, world hunger, child blindness,...

Your example is wrong even in our universe lol. In the trivial ring (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_ring ), 0=1 is true.

What you are probably imagining when talking about 0 and 1 are their representatives in the "integer ring" or maybe the ring of real numbers. Both are simply definitions made by humans and in no way universal truths.

English is probably not your first language, but still, this should be pretty clear to anyone with a basic understanding of it. Reread the sentences

Oh no, they bought a camper and a pool, those dirty criminals. We should give 100x more of our money to those who really deserve it, so they can buy their third private jet.

There is dark without light. Sound without silence. Nothing without something.

These are all true sentences.

You didnt even try, did you?

Dikinbaus