Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TP
Posts
32
Comments
154
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's an interesting perspective. Historically the fediverse was more European; Mastodon is based in Germany and initially got a lot of traction in France, NLNet has contributed a lot of the funding, and there's historically more adoption by European governmental organizations than US. But these days a lot of the energy is being driven by corporate interests (Flipboard, Wordpress, Meta, Ghost) which are primarily American (Ghost being the only exception), so that's leading to a change of dynamics. Distressing, especially given what's going on here in the US!

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Suggestions for people on Fosstodon considering moving

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Resources for choosing the right fediverse instance

    Technology @beehaw.org

    Can We Build Tech That Is Not Oppressive?

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    #GivingTuesday in the fediverse: instance admins, mutual aid, 501(c)(3)s, and more

    Politics @beehaw.org

    The Color of Surveillance: Surveillance / Resistance - Monday November 18

  • Misskey's a vibrant colorful very interactive experience

    Bluesky's a very good Twitter alternative, at least for now, although it's owned by a VC-funded startup so we'll see how long that lasts

    Mastodon (and even moreso forks like Glitch and Hometown) are good if you want a small-to-medium size community along with the ability to be part of broader conversations. It can be a decent Twitter alternative for some people (especially white techies) but Bluesky's a lot more usable, easy to get started on, and diverse.

  • What's the evidence you find "literally incontrovertible"?

    The comparison is apt though:

    • In 2020, almost all non-partisan voting rights organizations and election experts (as well as most Republicans, despite losing) were saying that there was in fact no evidence of widespread election fraud. So conservatives claiming election fraud were seen as conspiracy theorists who were spreading disinfo (either intentionally or because they really thought there was evidence).
    • In 2024, almost all non-partisan voting rights organizations and election experts (as well as most Democrats, despite losing) are saying that there was in fact no evidence of widespread election fraud. So ...
  • Sure, if it's somebody you know or trust who's saying this, then it's not disinformation; agreed about helping them contact election officials and/or other authorities, and if you think it's useful to amplify it, then I'm not trying to talk you out of it.

    If it's not somebody you know or trust, then amplifying it is quite possibly helping out a disinformation campaign.

    And in any case, amplifying individual claims is very different from the unsupported claims about "millions of missing votes", and that's what I am trying to talk people out of.

  • It's true that downballot Dems ran ahead of Harris in most states. Why do you think it's statistically unlikely? Polls ahead of the election showed downballot Dems were more popular than Harris. Republicans focused most of their negative campaigning on Harris. Biden's very unpopular and she didn't try to distance herself from him (I'm not saying that she should have, I'm just observing that she didn't). Sexists and racists were less likely to vote for Harris.

  • I talked about that in the article:

    Don't get me wrong, multiple voter suppression techniques actually were used to keep people from voting – purging voters from rolls, felon disenfranchisement, 6-hour lines, texts with false information, voter intimidation, voter id laws, signature challenges, etc etc etc. But that's not what these conspiracy allegations are focusing on.

    And I also discussed it in terms of the goals of people pushing these conspiracy theories:

    focusing attention on an alleged fraud that didn't occur is a good way to divert attention from all voter suppression that really has occurred and has been steadily ramping up ever since Republicans on the Supreme Court gutted the Voing Rights Act – and got even worse this year after Republicans blocked legislation that could have provided voters and election officials with more protection.

  • politics @lemmy.world

    Rumors, conspiracy theories, and disinformation about "millions of missing votes" and voting machine fraud

    Politics @beehaw.org

    Post-election disinfo: weaponized inaccurate exit polls targeting marginalized communities

  • Yeah, it's somewhat useful but certainly not a great solution. It's great that they went the opt-in route, but there aren't any good existing frameworks for how to do it, so they had to roll their own. There's certainly room for improvement, it would be great if either Bluesky or the Social Web Foundation (or both) or somebody else invested in it, but hard to know if and when thta'll happen.

  • For what it's worth, the guy who mostly maintains the Wikipedia page agrees with you. And yet even so, at least for now, the Wikipedia page states "The majority of fediverse platforms ... create connections between servers using the ActivityPub protocol" -- which pretty clearly implies that not all fediverse platforms use the ActivityPub protocol.

    Anyhow whether or not you agree to disagree ... we disagree. Time will tell how broad usage of the term evolves. In the original article I pointed to examples of TechCrunch and Mike Masnick using the term in the broader sense, but maybe those will turn out to be points off the curve. We shall see!

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yep. And also, like I said in https://privacy.thenexus.today/bluesky-atmosphere-fediverse/

    For one thing, most of the people who came to Mastodon in late 2022 didn't have good experiences ... so didn't stay in the Fediverse.6 Flash forward to 2024, and Mastodon still hasn't addressed the reasons why.

    Bluesky, by contrast, has put a lot of work into onboarding and usability – as well as giving people better tools protect themselves and others, and find and build communities ... So today, BTS ARMY and millions of Brazilians, and everybody else looking for a Twitter alternative are more likely to have a good experience on Bluesky than Mastodon.

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world

    A lot of good stuff is happening in the fediverses!

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    I for one welcome Bluesky, the ATmosphere, BTS ARMY, and millions of Brazilians to the fediverses!

    Technology @beehaw.org

    Angelica Ross is back—breaking barriers and building the future with TransTech

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Good things are happening in the fediverses! What's on your list?

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Why is Mastodon struggling to survive?

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Poll: How should the Social Web Foundation engage with Meta?

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Examples of racism on Lemmy?

    Asklemmy @lemmy.ml

    Examples of racism on Lemmy?

    Technology @beehaw.org

    4 things white people can do to start making the fediverse less toxic for Black people (DRAFT!)

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    4 things white people can do to start making the fediverse less toxic for Black people (DRAFT!)

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Eight tips about consent for fediverse developers

    Privacy @lemmy.ml

    Federal privacy legislation update: the American Privacy Rights Act (APRA)

    Fediverse @lemmy.world

    It's possible to talk about The Bad Space without being racist or anti-trans – but it's not as easy as it sounds