themeatbridge @ themeatbridge @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

4,753

Joined

2 yr. ago

I'm not reducing anyone to anything. Conservativism is always exactly the same, which is why it's called "conservativism." If a conservative isn't conservative, then they are something else.

It's not a generalization, it's the name for the phenomenon.

I don't disagree with your reasoning, but both of them are in their forties.

Is it still hooked up? You can draw some power from the line and hook up some low power leds, or maybe run a trickle charger for rechargeable batteries. If it's disconnected, it would make a decent hidden vault with a cat-shaped key.

You could also plug in an old phone and get a landline.

He's a conservative. Conservatives cannot be held to any sort of philosophical or ideological consistency, because their positions on any issue are entirely negotiable. There are no fundamentally conservative values beyond "is this good for me?" That's why it's so appealing to conservatives to have a personal savior who fully accepts your apology and offers divine forgiveness for any transgressions.

Well if this isn't just exactly what I imagined, I don't know what else it could be.

Well, Gaston isn't really attracted to anyone but himself. He's a classic narcissist, and his pursuit of Belle is purely to feed his ego. If he could have sex with himself, he would. Vigorously, and somehow selfishly.

Le Fou, on the other hand, is an effeminate sycophant. The live action explicitly makes him gay, but the animated version merely suggests it. Singing about how handsome and manly he is, and how much everybody wants to wrestle with Gaston with the biting and the spitting and the hair-covered inches.

As silly as it looks, there's a good reason for this. You can't just have a blank page because the user is going to wonder if something is missing. You have to say that the page is blank on purpose, at which point it's no longer blank. They could say "The only thing on this page is this sentence explaining that there is nothing else on this page" but that seems somehow more ridiculous.

I think it's just the font, but XKCD would have recreated the table and added a subtle, obscure reference to acknowledge in the alt text.

Or it's proof that God is real and he wants us to have heartburn.

Resevoir Dogs

Kirk Baltz.

Reverse this one and make that weird CGI baby the only muppet. That will make it less weird when she falls in love with an adult man, and he falls in love with her, a months-old baby.

I think I still have one of those FM dongles in a drawer, in case I ever need it.

And that would be hilarious.

Do you even hear yourself?

Germany is a real country though. Israel is a settler colony established through land theft.

Can you remind me why those Jewish immigrants had to move to Israel after WWII? Why they couldn't just go back to their homes in Europe?

By saying Israel has no right to exist I mean the racist genocidal ethnostate called Israel needs to be dismantled and become a one state with equal rights for all. That is not a call for genocide. That is a call for humanity.

I'll take you at your word that this is what you meant, but my point still stands because it does not come across that way at all. You may not be aware that there is an alarming resurgence of anti-Semitism globally (fueled in large part by the Israeli government engaging in the genocide of Palestinians). "Israel has no right to exist" is a common refrain among anti-Semites, and most of them do mean "Jewish people should not exist."

If you're not calling for a genocide, then you need to be clear when you're critical of Israel. Because sounding like a nazi gives credibility to the defenders of Israel who claim that all critics are nazis.

For the record no country has a right to exist. They either do exist or they don't.

Yes, and Israel exists.

Anyone who calls those things "communism," "woke," or "wrong" is not someone who gives a shit about these children or their mother.

dismantling the power of a geopolitical state in order to stop it from committing a genocide (which is what most people mean when they say "Israel doesn't have a right to exist")

I don't believe that is what most people mean when they say that.

As for the Nazi comparison, there were a lot of people who would have preferred we kill all the Nazis, but only a relatively small percentage were tried and convicted. Germany did not forfeit their right to exist, and the German people (including most of the Nazis) were allowed to continue on with their lives.

As for Hitler, I do think a trial would have been better for the world and the development of humanity. But like most narcissists, he was a coward and chose to shoot himself rather than face consequences.

The logical conclusion of opposing a genocide is not more genocide.

Let's be honest with ourselves, the world is a mess right now. There are no "good guys" coming to the rescue. There's no political or military power that will fix the discord or stop the violence. In an ideal world, Netanyahu and his leadership would be tried and convicted of crimes against humanity. Given the current climate, I'd settle for an armistice to end the murdering of civilians and to allow for humanitarian aid to reach the people who need it. The threat of another elected despot is not an argument against deposing the current one.

You're citing those polling numbers as evidence that I'm wrong? That we don't have a problem with messaging? If your plan is to convince me that we need to stop a genocide with a genocide, then I have sorry news for you. Even if it was 100% of Israelis polled, I would still be opposed to genocide. Existence is never a crime. We are defined by our choices, not by the circumstances of our birth. When people communicate, there is always an opportunity for people to grow and learn. Communication is the only path to peace, and the people who need to hear you will not hear you while you're saying they are monsters who do not deserve to live.

Yep, I'm one of them. Are we saying that the United States doesn't have a right to exist? Canada and Mexico have their own skeletons in their closets, too. Which countries have a right to exist? The Palestinians were "displaced" by the British, who took control from the Ottomans, who conquered the land from the Egyptians, the Mongols, the Crusades... how far back are we going to go?

Or maybe we accept that a nation is constructed of modern people who are not responsible for the sins of their forebears. Maybe we can criticize genocidal tyrants and war criminals without dehumanizing an entire citizenry and calling for their extermination. Because if both sides are calling for the eradication of the other, then the historical claim to the territory is irrelevant. If both sides justify violence with divine provenance, then neither side maintaims the moral high ground.

Israel is engaged in a genocide. They should be stopped, with violence if necessary. But condemning the people's right to exist blunts the criticism of genocide. It makes it appear to be a holy war between two violent terrorists, when that is far from the reality.