yeah, once you have the drives, building the rest of the system can be done for dummy cheap if you look at like cheap used workstations that some company or school is offloading. and it would still probably be a more capable system all around.
and it could still be worse... like i said, technically every single image macro is copyright infringement. and to your question, which I'm sorry, i don't care about, it's not what i was replying for, it really depends. performing another person's song for money is actually a big deal and illegal. so yeah, in your example that's a very very easy case. weird al is a great example of what you need to do to differentiate. cover bands are often a grey area, but can be gone after, it's just often easy to get away with.
no, you get used to how long it takes pretty quickly and can ignore it for the first 30 seconds safely no matter what. after like 5 attempts you just know how long to do it and there's no actual danger so...
I'm not trying to say what's right or wrong it should out shouldn't be. I'm just saying that if we apply copyright literally and aggressively there's numerous things that we take for granted that would go away.
that's kind of fair, but part of the point is that they didn't even need to access the accounts of people that were compromised. they just needed to access someone who was related to them to access their genetic info.
no it isn't, it's owned by yum brands, a Chinese restaurant conglomerate. not better, but not pepsico either.