Kalash @ theKalash @feddit.ch

Posts

0

Comments

1,129

Joined

2 yr. ago

No one would have been in trouble if they were married

Would being married actually nullify age of consent laws though?

Genuinely asking.

Dear Sir/Madam.

Fire! Fire! Help me!

123 Carenden Road.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

All the Best.

That explains why they had to come up with Theft and Shrubbery.

I work as a Programmer, so my laptop usually isn't far away when I need to take notes.

It's really just contract signitures and maybe the rare form, though almost anything can be done online these days.

Not just pens. Paperwork in general is fortunatly becoming obsolete. I haven't recieved anything important by physical mail in months and almost all invoices are now digitial.

I'm trying to remember when the last time was I used a pen. I think the contract I signed when I switched heath insurance a couple of years ago.

We don’t have any measure by which to determine what is or is not moral truth.

I agree. But that is because moral truth is something that can't be messured because it is not objective in the first place.

To give an analogy - whether or not there is some all-powerful being controlling everything in the universe. We have no way to measure whether or not there is. But there is still an objective truth.

No, the very fact that you can't messure it means it's not objectivly true. It's unknowable. Hypothetical. It's literally the opposite of objective.

That definition perfectly aligns with what I just told you and directly contradicts your point.

There is such a thing as objective morality, or moral truth

Then please tell me how I it can be factually messured or observed. I'm waiting.

For example: “being gay is wrong” and “being gay is not wrong”

Both cannot be true. One is right, one is wrong. This is objective

Ok, you seem to fundamentally misunderstand what "objective" means. Neither of these statements is true.

Objective means, something can be confirmed by observation. For example if we were in a room and there would be a rock on the table and you say "there is a rock on the table" that would be true. And everyone else in the world could look into the room and observe for them themselves that the rock is infact sitting on the table. That's objective truth.

However if you said "this rock is ugly", that is not objective. Differnet people will have different opinion on the prettiness of the rock, because it's an inherently subjective quality. There is not "true" value for the rock's prettiness that can be observed.

The same goes for all moral judgements. You can not observe or meassure a moral quality objetivily because it's a value that is assigned by the judgment of a human brain. It's not an intrinsic quality of nature.

What two contradicting statements?

But "moral truth" is.

I don't see the tricky part. If it can't be empirically measured, it's not objective.

So to put it correctly:

“Moral judgement is subjective. Moral truth is too.”

There is absolutely an objective right and wrong.

Could you point me to how I can meassure or otherwise empirically confirm these objective rights and wrongs?

Tell me again how cars aren’t the problem.

You do realise cars actually require a license to operate? You literally already have "car control".

So what exactly is your agrument again?

I was talking about the previous one, I could always see yours.

Outside of the very small niche use as payment for illegal services, it's basically a scam.

When it is mentioned in mainstream media it's almost always by some asshole trying to get more people into their scam, thus the negative reaction.

I checked and I can see the images when I look at it through your kbin instance. But it doesn't show on any of the 3 lemmy instances I checked. Problem might be with kbin not federating images to lemmy.

Yours is trying to load something? It's literally just an empty comment for me.

That's rough buddy.

US Phones.

Scary Movie (2000)