Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SU
Posts
7
Comments
3
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • TL;DR

    • Claude Opus 4 leads in raw performance and prompt adherence.
    • It understands user intentions better, reminiscent of 3.6 Sonnet.
    • High taste. The generated outputs are tasteful. Retains the Opus 3 personality to an extent.
    • Though unrelated to code, the model feels nice, and I never enjoyed talking to Gemini and o3.
    • Gemini 2.5 is more affordable in pricing and takes fewer API credits than Opus.
    • One million context length is undefeatable for large codebase understanding.
    • Opus is the slowest in time to first token. You have to be patient with the thinking mode.
  • Technology @lemmy.world

    Notes on AlphaEvolve

    Technology @lemmy.world

    OpenAI o3 vs. Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. o4-mini

    Technology @lemmy.world

    What is Model Context Protocol (MCP): Explained

    Technology @lemmy.world

    Notes on Llama 4: The Hits, the Misses, and the Disasters

    Technology @lemmy.world

    Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Coding Comparison

    Technology @lemmy.world

    Notes on Gemini 2.5 Pro: A new coding SOTA

    Technology @lemmy.world

    Deepseek v3 0324: Finally, the Sonnet 3.5 at Home