I'm suggesting that if you take your logic and apply it to all the letters equally, you'll end up with the changes I listed.
If that seems wrong, then the case for consistency isn't as strong as you first suggested.
A stunning piece of analysis, all the more so coming from a conservative. A nice reminder that not every one on the conservative side is a ruthless moron.
Apple most certainly has the "Valve money and resources" to throw at the problem. They just choose not to.
Bottom line is Mac gaming sucks because Apple has chosen that outcome.
I reckon it's because the question triggers cognitive dissonance. The answer they need to give makes them realise they are incompetent, or unreasonable, or capitulating with someone else who is. They don't want to believe that about themselves so they get angry with you to shift the focus. Now you're the problem and they don't have to face their own failures.
Can't figure out why the 100 largest landowning families aren't using their land for any of the other reasons. Surely some of them are having it farmed for them too?
Me too. The control scheme is just awful.