stolid_agnostic @ stolid_agnostic @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

807

Joined

2 yr. ago

You meant a “first time idiot who can’t notice that the oven is still cold”.

No. You put “k” for Kelvin. Everything else is assumed to be Celsius and Fahrenheit should be abandoned.

And deflection.

Isn’t VR still pretty shit?

Your point is to continue with a series of false equivalencies and whataboutism. This is what it sounds like this:

“You know that X happened, right.”

“Oh yeah, did you know that they did Y? So there.”

Blame Biden and vote R down the ticket.

Oh no, those poor poor billionaires. Whatever shall they do?

Time to take you pills and go to sleep.

You see the problem here is that lives are not disposable. Taking all the risks and making the people suffer the consequences is really shitty. I if they instead focused on steady growth rather than giant leaps, nobody would get laid off. Layoffs are a sign of incompetence from leadership

Hey twin!!

Nah this one is on the business bros who networked their way through an mba without learning anything.

This has long been my impression. It’s a plaything for the “elite” engineers aka former children of wealthy people who grew up with tutors but never developed as people.

IRTc innovation, I’ve also long felt this way. There are so many good products out there but most seem like the software equivalent of As Seen on TV plastic crap that solves some problem that nobody has.

Worse is that they can’t even do things like set timers anymore.

The single worst decision they made was rolling back the 20% of work time being dedicated to side projects. That’s where all their good early ideas came from. It was replaced by politics instead.

It’s when you one day accidentally bump the table hard and the TV falls on its face. That’s why they are wide—to prevent that.

I’m not sure where the word “slams” comes from; the court said that it can’t give an opinion one way or another.

There really isn’t to disbelieve even as far back as the 70s. The models weren’t as good back then but the conclusions remain essentially unchanged.

Yes. There is no excuse for someone with the science training to believe these things. She was either a very weak person or the program she studied in wasn’t very strong. Either way, although it’s good to model perspective change, this isn’t the example we need.

I’m saying that this is stupid technology that will only work if you separate it from the public.

lol I really hope that you never become a leader. It’s clear that you lack the proper intuitions