Self-evident, but thank you. My question is about why.
English media, including the media on the website you're reading right now, is arranged left to right. Adherence to this rule is what makes our language comprehensible. These grammatical rules are not impediments; they are the foundations of understanding.
Violating them is done with specific purpose in mind. Anagrams are a puzzle in which the order of letters is scrambled, and the player must correct it. In this case the violation of the rule is a game, valuable because it provides enjoyment to the player.
Although I appreciate your quick response, I am looking for a more thorough one. If this arbitrary and meaningless syntax violation has any redeeming qualities I'm not seeing them. But thanks again.
No you've already pointed out several glaring red flags, including trying to isolate your daughter, lying to her, etc. Her teacher should see that too but I guarantee her teacher doesn't get paid enough to care.
TD offers cross-border banking services, allowing U.S. residents to open Canadian bank accounts remotely. Their TD Cross-Border Banking program provides seamless access to both U.S. and Canadian accounts.
TD.COM
RBC (Royal Bank of Canada):
RBC provides options for non-residents to open Canadian bank accounts. While specific details about remote account opening are limited, it's advisable to contact RBC directly to inquire about their current policies.
CIBC (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce):
CIBC offers cross-border banking solutions, including the CIBC Bank USA Smart Account, which is available to clients with an eligible CIBC (Canada) deposit account. This account is accessible to both Canadian and U.S. residents.
CIBC.COM
Scotiabank:
Scotiabank's StartRight® program is designed for newcomers to Canada and may offer options for non-residents to open accounts. It's recommended to contact them directly to understand the possibilities for U.S. citizens.
STARTRIGHT.SCOTIABANK.COM
Considerations:
Documentation: Be prepared to provide valid identification, proof of address, and possibly additional documentation to comply with Canadian banking regulations.
Fees and Services: Review the fee structures and services offered by each bank to determine which aligns best with your financial needs.
Yes, a U.S. citizen with no other nationality or immigration status can open a bank account in Canada or Europe without physically leaving the U.S., but the process varies by country and bank. Here are the key factors:
General Requirements:
Remote Account Opening Policies – Some international banks allow non-residents to open accounts remotely, but many require an in-person visit.
Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Regulations – Most banks require proof of identity, proof of address, and sometimes tax information (e.g., IRS Form W-9 for U.S. citizens).
FATCA Compliance – Due to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), foreign banks may require additional documentation from U.S. citizens, including tax reporting details.
Residency Restrictions – Some banks may require a local address or residency in the country, though a few accept a U.S. address.
Remote Account Options – A few banks in Canada, the UK, and Europe allow remote account opening through online banking platforms or by working with a local branch of an international bank.
Possible Options:
Canada: Some Canadian banks (e.g., RBC, TD, Scotia) allow U.S. citizens to open accounts remotely, especially if they have a financial relationship with the bank’s U.S. counterpart.
Europe: Online banks and fintech companies (e.g., Wise, Revolut, N26) may allow U.S. citizens to open accounts remotely, but full banking services (like a local IBAN) may require proof of EU residence.
Would you like specific recommendations for a country or type of account?
It's to let each other know that we're still fighting. I'm not just laying down and taking it. I want my neighbors to see me on the news and think, there is still hope out there.
Please consider calling the cops. If they ask why it took you so long, tell them it was because you were afraid that the attackers would retaliate.
You're looking to get CCTV or other camera footage of the incident. It's possible someone else reported it. If you can get proof, you may be able to get restitution.
Self-evident, but thank you. My question is about why.
English media, including the media on the website you're reading right now, is arranged left to right. Adherence to this rule is what makes our language comprehensible. These grammatical rules are not impediments; they are the foundations of understanding.
Violating them is done with specific purpose in mind. Anagrams are a puzzle in which the order of letters is scrambled, and the player must correct it. In this case the violation of the rule is a game, valuable because it provides enjoyment to the player.
Although I appreciate your quick response, I am looking for a more thorough one. If this arbitrary and meaningless syntax violation has any redeeming qualities I'm not seeing them. But thanks again.