stevedidWHAT @ stevedidWHAT @lemmy.world

Just trying to do some cool shit with people and have fun and respectful. *

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

815

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yeah I mean I would want to know motives and history of this Jackson-Bolanos figure before I chalked it up to a hate crime. Anyone seen any articles or blog posts with more info sources? News always seems so hell bent on following one narrative

ETA?

FILLED WITH LEAD JUICE WATER SO THEY CAN BE MORE SMURT

LESS COMPLAINING MORE BREEDING AND BUYING (whip emoji)

Did you read the actual paper that was conducted in nature? Kinda different story.

In fact, their abstract in the paper is that “there are some instances” where gpt does the racist thing. Yet when I do the exact same question numerous times, I get:

How odd. It’s almost like the baseline model doesn’t actually do that shit unless you fuck with top_p or temperature settings, and/or specify specific system level prompts.

I’ll tell you what I find it real amusing that all these claims come out of the wood work years and years after we’ve been screaming about data biases since at least before the early 2000s. AI isn’t the bad guy, the people using it and misconfiguring it to purposefully scare people off from the tech are.

Fuck that.

Edit: matter of fact, they don’t even mention what their settings were for these values, which are fucking crucial to knowing how you even ran the model to begin with. For example, you set top_p to be the float/decimal value 0-1 signifying what percentage of top common results you want. Temperature is from 0-2 and dictates how cold and logistical the answers are, or how hot and creative/losely related the outputs are.

You’re entitled to your own opinions

Fully aware of jail breaking techniques. Which they, as you mention, constantly patch and correct.

I have to agree with you, your comment was entirely unfair and only fuels the furnaces of the rich who want to take away this tech from the public domain for their own, personal, privatized usage of it.

According to who? Against what baselines?

What’s up with people just throwing blatantly false stuff out on the internet as if it’s fact?

It blocks a whole wide range of stuff and is very effective against those. There’s always room for improvement but I reject the notion that we do it without science and without actual measurable facts and stats.

What are you talking about, GPT constantly filters and flags input.

You’re talking out of your ass.

Because none of it loaded for the mobile view on my iPhone, didn’t expect it to be a bug with the website.

Things didn’t need to get hostile, you had no need calling names and throwing around stereotypes. You took my viewpoint of the article some random person wrote and took it personally.

I can’t help you with your anger dude, I’m sorry.

In fact, prior to reading the offending comment, I was pretty open to your comment citing the science and nature articles.

Over an article about corn enrichment.

This might be the case, the mobile view that pops up is a a few paragraphs of 1-2 sentences each, really just introductory stuff. This is my guess as to what’s going on, thanks for commenting

Oh man, look at the consistency!!

If you made this (or not) would you be willing to discuss your workflow for this and the techniques/technologies used?

Doesn’t have to be specific, Ik a lot of people want to make a living off this or just like to have a personal private style, just interested in the techniques really

Pretty simple, you’re not telling the full story of the statistics.

• About 40% of corn produced is for biofuels
• 36% is used as animal feed

Furthermore, the US exported nearly $20 billion dollars worth of said corn for 2021.

Much of the corn usage in food is for high fructose corn syrup, which, as you can imagine, is different from eating sweet corn for dinner.

Corn isn’t used primarily for feeding people, it’s for fuel, animal feed, and garbage additives. Change my mind please.

Came here to say this! Did you see the one where he tried to make the bullet proof wood too?

So much left to be discovered in this world! 🤩

Cool stereotyping bro. Post some more articles with crap for sources and crap for writing and surprise pikachu when people ask for actual data and good information.

Classic asshole.

Beautiful explanation and data to boot. Appreciate the time you took to politely correct my misunderstanding. Appreciate it!

Now we’re cookin, would’ve rather read the science or nature articles over a local news resource any day. It’s so easy to pop up “news sites” and push them as authority figures

It’s a shit article, the “scientific detail” makes no sense, is this an attempt to spread malware/spyware or just clickbait/analytics boosting

Edit: corn is most definitely digestible, and because of its common usage in many commercial food products, we could improve these nutrient areas allegedly.

Ignore: … of all the edible things in the world.

They chose corn. Which barely gets digested.

What am I missing here, this is way too obviously strange to me, gotta be missing something.

But seriously: This article has like 3 sentences, why the fuck was this posted lmao.

Well done, appreciate the sharing of knowledge. Kinda wish you would’ve dove into Stabble Diffusion image generation as it’s one of the most popular and powerful techniques out there, although it’s not a GPT. Maybe some other time! Looking forward to your next work 😊