Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SS
Posts
0
Comments
175
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • We used it for ERP, including sales, CSR, and inventory. But we still had a separate WMS, and we had to build glue to sync the WMS inventory data with the D365 data, bidirectionally.

  • Yeppers. When I worked on a D365 transition we were upgrading from a 1980s era DOS based thing (D3 aka Pick). We literally had like one of the last Pick developers left on earth. He ended up training his two kids on the system so they could take over for him. They all ended up having to learn X++ instead. I wonder which was worse to deal with.

  • I spent the better part of a year and a half writing automation for an integrated stack that included D365. (RSAT wasn't an option since we had to also interact with other systems and sql databases and what not to perform end-to-end flows across multiple systems.) It was literally the biggest resource and time suck of all the stuff we had to interact with -- and we had to interact with some really hoky stuff. But D365 took the cake. At least two people quit over it.

  • Thanks for this response, I've actually gone and bookmarked your instance for a later look. I didn't really find an instance like that on the lemmy server list for whatever reason, so this is nice, appreciate it.

  • Not sure if it's a question. I was looking into PT, but there aren't hardly any instances that are 1. open and 2. have much activity. Also, it seemed like you only got the content on the instance, it wasn't easy at all to find non-local content.

    (Also, most of it was playthroughs)

  • I was in my teens before I discovered that "weed" just meant "plant you don't want." There is not really a biological definition of weed. Anything is a weed if you don't want it there.

  • I'm not even talking about good parents vs bad parents. I'm talking about the reasons people have kids. What is the positive reason to have children? I can't think of one that isn't a bad prediction, like wanting to bring a good person into the world. It's not like raising children is a fun fair either. So it's rewarding? Well first of all that's selfish, second of all that's something that people apply to literally every difficult situation they manage to get through.

    So what's the utilitarian reason for having kids? They're all either selfish or prideful. Even if you're a good parent.

    Everyone is like "no you're wrong" but I'm not seeing any actual counter arguments or examples of reasons to have kids that aren't ultimately self-interested and/or bad speculation.