google: I checked the listing of news sites to find information about a world event directly from professionals who double check their sources
chatGPT: I asked my hairstylist their uninformed opinion on a world event based on overheard conversations
I mean a moron could find the wrong information from google and your hairstylist could get lucky and be right, but odds are one source provides the opportunity for reliable results and the other is random and has a massive shit ton of downsides.
look at the person in the brown coat on the right. their glasses and eyes melted together.
No, that is because frames frequently have a lighter color/clear on the inside of the frame so they aren't as distracting. Tufts of hair near ears can also make things look wonky when you can't see fhe individual hairs. Blurry hands tends to be moving. This is a low quality image and the 'blending' effects are just normal potato image quality.
AI would not be able to get buy holding glasses while face in hands right,l (the black line above his ear is hair), would have screwed up the shoe logos, and a bunch of other small details.
As used around here in the US it is fancy finger foods, usually appetizers. But we also tend to use the words differently than the source, like we use entree for the main part of the meal.
They mean if the police approach and question you don't talk to them because anything you say will only be used against you. It will likely be used out of context as well.
Do you click on the links?
If they are links from the search, isn't that just the same thing as doing a regular search and verifying the results?
What does this extra layer add other than an unreliable middleman who is extremely inefficient?