SorteKanin @ SorteKanin @feddit.dk

Posts

15

Comments

1,648

Joined

2 yr. ago

Not as far as I am aware - I don't think you can really fix it within the protocol, i.e. without a breaking change. Then you may as well make a new protocol.

So aside from Baldurs gate 3, who's actually making good RPGs these days?

Why don't they just keep working from home and get fired? Instead of having to quit themselves?

So as far as I gather, it's still just as open source as before but you just can't sell it on the Confluence marketplace? Seems fair.

Never forget to put glue on pizza, it really brings out a good flavour and makes the cheese all stringy!

omg what is this, reverse psychology? lol

Don't feel obliged haha 😅

Your client doesn't parse according to CommonMark then, which requires spacing between the # and the heading.

Finished season 2 of Ancient Magus Bride. I think the first part of season 2 is okay but it got boring for me at the end. Too many other characters that I honestly don't care much for and too few scenes with Chise and Elias together, which is what I feel the story is truly about. Episode 6 is amazing though, maybe even the best episode of the whole show so far.

Will check out Summer Time Rendering next! Do let me know if you ever give Steins;Gate another shot.

Any FEP trying to fix this will be incompatible with existing instances, so I don't really see how it's gonna work.

no idea if ActivityPub would get in the way

It totally would. In ActivityPub, all objects (like users and posts) have an identifier that includes the domain name. For instance, your ID is https://midwest.social/u/m_f. That's what identifies your user. There is no way to change an ID - the point of an ID is after all that it stays the same and still refers to the same entity. This is a pretty serious limitation of ActivityPub right now unfortunately.

One always lies, the other never tells the truth.

Is it possible to define an ecosystem in such a way that one can predict how it will evolve in stages?

Intuitively, I think this would be a chaotic system, much like the weather. Chaotic systems cannot be predicted over long time scales.

I mean... I feel like this could still apply 😅

TypeScript for the backend too? Sorry, can't help with that. But I'd say just open source it anyway.

This page has like no information basically.

I wonder how accurate it is though.

I don't actually see that many political questions in this comm but maybe that's just me. Looking at the top of all time, I mostly notice this one, which honestly is more like a rant than a question (I dislike Trump as much as the next guy but this is clearly not a neutrally stated/good faith question and just a way for the OP to vent their frustration) and should probably be removed on that basis rather than it being a political question.

Honestly looking further, a lot of the political "questions" in this comm are just rants disguised as questions. I think it would make sense to disallow rants. You could say it's already included under the "all posts must be legitimate questions" part of rule 1 but explicitly calling it out and enforcing it would be nice.

Well there are in fact other options than Lemmy already, like Mbin and Piefed. This is good - more options means users have more choices and they all still interoperate so everyone can choose what they want without being separated.

Yea - when it comes to a security review, it's really the backend that matters the most though.