Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
2,573
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • ...it kinda leaves me wondering what happened to the gaming industry

    Higher detail graphics use exponentially higher amounts of data storage, processing, and transfer speeds. Many of today's games run fine on older hardware on lower settings, just not the ones with the high detail geaphics.

  • You know how I came up with these words? I hallucinated them. It’s just a guided hallucination.

    The the word hallucination means literally anything you want it to. Cool, cool. Very valiant of you.

  • Have to fight back against the bullies to get them to stop.

  • Same, although I also know that my local dealership was busier because some nearby dealers dragged their feet on recalls.

  • Thank you! At least I know my current vehicle is not in the group, but the 2005 Camry I had for 18 years might have been.

    Good thing I never needed it to find out!

  • It is apparently necessary to show the real world implications in practice for people to understand.

  • Looks like a bunch of people (I’m guessing non-parents) disagree.

    I am a parent and disagree. Surprised myself at least twice by arriving at work and seeing her still in the seat while grabbing the sun shade. Could have sworn that she had been dropped off both times.

    People aren't perfect, and something being important doesn't mean people suddenly become perfect. The fact that it is as rare as it is now is a sign that people take it seriously, but people make mistakes no matter how important the thing is.

  • It’s designed in a ways that’ll make it inherently incorrect. Even on a physical basis (due to numeric issues). It’s not a problem of the algorithm because it has been designed that way. The problem is that you don’t know how to correctly use it.

    "It doesn't make a good source of knowledge."

    "Yeah, but it is designed to be inherently wrong"

    How does that make any sense when trying to use something for knowledge? Being inherently wrong is the opposite of helpful for knowledge.

    AI is great at pattern recognition, but knowledge isn't pattern recognition. Needing to know when it gives false information requires the "supervisor" to already have that knowledge. That makes the AI less useful than a simple reference because at least the reference can come from a trusted source.

    If people stopped trying to jam AI into situations where being correct is important it wouldn't be a problem. But excusing that because it is designed to be inherently wrong deserves another LOLWUT.

  • It also wouldn't be a source of knowledge. It would be a shitty calculator.

  • Which is combined with the regular "you don't know what happened before filming" is even worse.

  • The expression really pulled itself up by the bootstraps.

  • User drop suggests ‘rejection of harsh rhetoric’ spewed by the former US president, rightwing media analyst says

    They are sick of how it is being said, not necessarily what is being said.

  • When the internet was new I thought that the spread of knowleege would raise up people's awareness of things they had not been exposed to under the false assumption that the vast majority of people where reasonable, but uninformed.

    Nope, I was wrong. At best a slight majority are reasonable with varying levels of ignorance and the rest are willfully ignorant.

  • I can't think of any industry where private equity buyouts do anything other than run the business into the ground in search of short term profits, so this isn't surprising.

  • As far as I am aware it is a regional difference in spelling, and that is what I get when searching for definitions.

    What small but importance difference are you referring to?

  • ha, and this is the guy that promised to bring free speech to the platform.

    He showed his true colors well before acquiring twitter, including the fact that his love of freeze peach was total bullshit.

    I have no idea why anyone falls for his act.

  • The man has zero strategy beyond spewing bullshit and seeing what sticks.