Don't forget all the fifth-columnists who keep on trying to convince young people that voting can't change anything. They're desperate to push that ideal, and why not? It's worked for decades.
I'm bothered by the fact that you made a statement that's not internally consistent and contradicts itself. Like whatever you like, but if you're going to cite a reason, be accurate. Don't be so dense.
Telemetry is important for desktop developers, you can negate it but it's a fact
I'm going to assume you know what the subject and object of that sentence are. Here's the thing about how language works on my planet: through the magic of a radical new concept called "context", we can accurately discern both meaning and normative statements from what people say and how they phrase it. In other words, "It's a fact that telemetry is important for desktop developers" is an ostensibly descriptive statement that also creates a normative statement in the same way that standing in the sun casts a shadow: it has to, it isn't optional. It's "Desktop developers who don't use telemetry are ignoring something that it's factual to say is important they not ignore". Please tell me you get it now, and that you don't need the rest spoonfed to you.
Yeah I've seen a few things get messed up by that idiotic rule. When you euphemistically say "reasons" in italics, it sounds worse than it is. I assumed you were trying to gently tell people "Google suspended the dev for being racist" or something.
It's pretty funny how they're trying to characterize a Linux distro as independence from Western tech. The closest we've gotten to that idea is TempleOS, not a Linux distro with spyware baked into it.
Don't worry about me, worry about the Burger King employee who "forgot" my Zesty sauce.