If everything reports open then what ports do you focus on first?
I don't see an issue here. An attacker would be overwhemed with choise and excitement so that he wouldn't be able to decide which port to choose first, get stuck for a several months unable to decide? He'd toss a coin then.
You can’t pretend-close it and still have that service work.
indeed, a service on a port would no longer properly work. However, pretending that an open port is closed is possible the same way when pretending that's open
It's got CLI too - alright. But is it any de-facto, mature, well-known, widely used? What gurantees that it's as secure as openssl or gpg? It might have plenty of bugs and vulnerabilies.
As if Youtube didn't promote conspiracy theories and almost Nazi rhetorics that serve the country it's based in. They do, which they don't call as such. Everything else they'll call conspiracy theories and propaganda.
Not in the direct war - correct. But in a proxy one. But even in it we haven't been to even match Russia's weapon production and which we have also admitted. By the margin of 3-7 times.
But that's about weapons. What about economy? Geopolitics? No major blow-ups for Russia, if not the opposite, either.
but an attacker isn't obliged to take on all the open ports, he could work with some of them - the ones that may seem the most interesting to him