Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SA
Posts
4
Comments
20
Joined
12 mo. ago

Arch Linux @lemmy.ml

How to switch between the black and light themes authomatically?

  • Ok, back to this then:

    If everything reports open then what ports do you focus on first?

    I don't see an issue here. An attacker would be overwhemed with choise and excitement so that he wouldn't be able to decide which port to choose first, get stuck for a several months unable to decide? He'd toss a coin then.

  • You can’t pretend-close it and still have that service work.

    indeed, a service on a port would no longer properly work. However, pretending that an open port is closed is possible the same way when pretending that's open

  • Do you youself understand what you're talking about?

    then focus on those ports with more expensive/slower scans to find out what is running on those ports.

    What do you mean by "focus on those ports"? What are "more expensive/slower scans"?

    If everything reports open

    not every port gets reported to be open but only some of them

    what ports do you focus on first?

    me? or an attacker? he could work with any ports he wishes

  • Programming @programming.dev

    How could simulating the ports as open be useful?

    Programming @programming.dev

    Simple and de-facto way to encrypt files and directories in Linux

  • As if Youtube didn't promote conspiracy theories and almost Nazi rhetorics that serve the country it's based in. They do, which they don't call as such. Everything else they'll call conspiracy theories and propaganda.

  • Politics @beehaw.org

    Satellite Images Show First LNG Ship at Sanctioned Russian Plant

  • . Some of them could also be implemented with native messaging.

    Some? Or all?

    uBlockOrigin would still loose some of its features and capabilities nonetheless, even if a sub-set of them could be implemented in other ways. Not?

  • Not in the direct war - correct. But in a proxy one. But even in it we haven't been to even match Russia's weapon production and which we have also admitted. By the margin of 3-7 times.

    But that's about weapons. What about economy? Geopolitics? No major blow-ups for Russia, if not the opposite, either.