sanpedropeddler @ sanpedropeddler @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

359

Joined

2 yr. ago

Finally I can fly a 208 caravan without a license

I do actually care about other elections, but this post seemed to be specifically about the presidential election.

What if I'm obstaining from voting because my subdivision of the bus will always vote for the cliff instead of the ice cream regardless of what I do

Waco wasn't even a hostage situation. We just killed a bunch of weird religious people.

Putin does not control everything that happens in Russia either. That would be ridiculous. Maybe he had some warning but didn't take it seriously, but he certainly didn't support it and he certainly didn't do it.

I understand hating Putin but he's not behind literally every bad thing that happens in Russia.

Who would refuse a mysterious blue orb of personality

Just do chest compressions only

I interpreted this as meaning small breasts are more value dense

I would've assumed it should have been designed to dampen the input to a point where it isn't dangerous, instead of ignoring it entirely. There could be a reason they didn't do that which I'm not seeing, but that seems like a good idea at first glance.

There is no "probably" here, it just a possibility.

Its a possibility that seems very likely, that's what I mean by probably.

If you brought the evidence you have right now that Boeing killed this guy for a civil claim, you would be laughed out of court.

That's very interesting, however, I am not in court.

I know its speculation, that's why I'm using the word probably. There is a rock solid motive, but no hard evidence. Which is why I'm not going to outright claim they did it. Maybe your definition of probably is different than mine, but to me, it means there is a very real possibility that I'm wrong.

Iberia flight 1456

I think a "probably" is pretty reasonable considering the circumstances. Its a lot less certainty than I'm seeing in the rest of these comments.

Absolutely, I don't mean there is no warning whatsoever. There is almost always a history of depression, but that history is not always visible to loved ones, let alone the public. I just mean they are likely not specifically planning to commit suicide until soon before they do it, which at least in my experience is true

If you're going to fly Boeing at all, what is the point in avoiding the 737-max?

To be fair, they would've said that regardless. Its standard corporate speak.

Most people that kill themselves do so on a whim. Its probably not the case, but its not impossible. I'm guessing either the coroner is corrupt, or they have actual evidence it was a suicide. If it was a murder, then I doubt Boeing would do it without assurance it couldn't be traced back to them. So regardless of what actually happened, the only official story there will ever be is that it was a suicide. That is, unless Boeing is as reckless about murder as they are about building planes.

It was a gunshot wound to the head. Its plausible the wound was self inflicted, although its pretty clear Boeing probably did it. They are evil, not stupid.

The only crash I know of thats similar to what they're talking about happened in an airbus plane, and during landing not takeoff. The pilots tried to pull up on their side sticks to avoid crashing, but the plane ignored the input because it would have overcorrected and caused the plane to stall. As a result they crashed onto the runway.

That isn't to say Boeing doesn't have a history with such things. Look into United Airlines 811 in 1989. Improper design caused a massive chunk of the fuselage to be ripped out in flight, throwing 9 people into the ocean and causing a rapid decompression. Initial investigations said the cause was human error, but the family of one of the victims researched it themselves and found out that wasn't the case.