Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SM
Posts
0
Comments
11
Joined
3 wk. ago

  • We lost track of what money was supposed to be for... a representation of the resources and services in circulation. In which it was supposed to facilitate trade by creating tokens to facilitate transactions without the requirement of trust in the absence of a good, like when a farmer would need a tool from a blacksmith but the goods that the farmer has are only available when harvested in which the tool that the blacksmith has is required to retrieve them. In the presence of trust, the blacksmith was going to still trade and expect the goods when time was due. In the absence of trust, like in relation to a stranger, this trade wouldn't go forward. Money as a representational token solved this sort of common issue. And this became a necessity when tribes went above the Dunbar's number.

    Cut to now...

    What the hell is an economy even supposed to represent anymore? It is certainly not a representation of the resources and services in circulation, that's for sure. 6 out of 9 planetary boundaries already breached all to ensure the survival of this abstraction. Some even call it Moloch as a reference to the pagan god which required human sacrifice. I thinks it's worse, as it requires the sacrifice of everything, not just humans. But it is certainly a clever nod to something that was only real because people believed it to be.

    Back to your project. A FOSS Barter Facilitator. There's nothing I don't like about this. Just make sure the protocols remain open to federation of future FOSS Barter Facilitators and you have a slice of Utopia to challenge the dystopian hell we're in.

    You have something here that can alleviate people's lives in times of great need. Resource collapse is imminent now. If that is not at least partially avoided, that makes the collapse of the global economic system inevitable. What happens after that is a fool's errand to even attempt to guess. We only know it's not gonna be peaceful and nice given the stupidity in human nature. Scarcity always leads to the forming of new predation systems. That is how predation was formed in Nature. The incapacity for self-regulation led to animals to reproduce and consume more than the regenerative availability of their setting allowed, leading them to predate on each other. This is how violence emerged in Nature and still does to this day. When we lose track of self regulation we return to the scavenger's rule of the wild.

    But this helps in giving people access to trade without the requirement of capital tokens. Huge spikes in inflation, unemployment and mass migrations are only going to increase in volume and in rate as resources continue to collapse worldwide. We're in a feedback loop and war and A.I. will only accelerate the velocity of it.

    Or, you know, we could have more ideas like yours and reduce resource intake, increase individual resiliency and in doing so, lessening the panic in the common struggles.

    So...

    I'm certainly saving this post and link and share it with anyone who is inclined to listen.

    I'm not a coder, so I thank you for such a wonderful contribution to the world.

  • I don't think white nationalists mind being called white nationalists. The same for zionists or islamists. What these descriptors and the people who stand by them have in common is that they all share isolationism, supremacy and the disdain for otherness. These features are all intertwined and inseparable, like the three sides of a shitty triangle.

    One can say being called one of those descriptors when one finds them wrong and disagreeable is obviously offensive to the person in question.

    As for if it constitutes hate speech... it's a mess. I'm not one to police language and speech.

    As the defense of every hateful person is that they can just be ignorant. And how true that is. But how convenient as well.

    Trying to legislate intention is impossible, and banning words is a terrible idea. And using the elusive concept of the status quo for a barometer of what is acceptable is also not a good idea at all. So... what are we left with? Allowing speech to fight back speech, basically. It's far from perfect, but is the best we have.

    But in this case, yes, this is just someone drumming up fear in the racist bias of a portion of the public.

    As for if he is ignorant and believes the nonsense he speaks or doesn't and is just mad that there's an actual voice for the people to hinder and reduce the control of the elites, which include him and the moron tech bro brigade he's a part of...

    I would say the distinction is irrelevant.

    But that's just me.

  • I'm going to hinder the complexity that is required to properly answer your question, for the sake of brevity...

    Islamist=zionist=supremacist

    You can say that it's the same product in different colours.

    As to this case in particular... It's a racist trying to call someone a racist to distract from the fact that this is a capitalist that doesn't like a socialist, because power doesn't concede and it hates sharing.

    Mamdani is actually succeeding at connecting the elite class to all the societal issues in the population's eye.

    So... It's time for whistling in the racists through the post 9/11 phobia. Which in New York... you can fill in the rest.

    If someone wants to add more complexity to my very reductionist take, please do.

  • In my opinion it lacks the core essentials of game design.

    But one ought to get used to it. With the A.I. boom, procedurally generated is no longer secluded to the dungeons and "rogue like" games, as the future in the mind of a lot of game devs these days is how it augments the possibilities of any given game. And while in theory it is true, in practice it translates into very bland gaming. Because it lacks the intention and precision in hitting whatever makes the contextual gameplay interesting and engaging in the first place.

    But... to each their own, I'd say.

  • It checks with everything else. I've never seen this level of overt neglect to public health from any government of any country in my lifetime.

    From vaccines to healthcare research and healthcare access and even food inspection safety... from climate research, to weather monitoring to natural disaster prevention... they're readying a level of catastrophe that I can't even fathom what's to come.

    I've already met a lot of terrified Americans who migrated to my country in Europe to avoid so much of this. I can already see a lot of more of them to come, and it frightens me the global health crisis that will erupt from it.

    And by the way, isn't asbestos still legal to use in the US? I'm genuinely asking. I remembered being told so and was shocked that it still was. But that was a while ago.

  • And not just in California. Or just the U.S. But the whole wide world.

    One can dream.

    But seriously, Android users from all over the world who haven't degoogled should sue and keep extending the precedents.

    And then use the money from the settlements, if they get them, to buy a degoogled phone.

    Or just degoodle the one they have and install Ubuntu Touch, Sailfish OS, Graphene or /e/os depending on the hardware they have. That way they're not even spending Google money to get rid of google.

  • Yeah, RFK does sound like he believes the craziness he's spewing. He's gonna get a lot of people killed, that's for sure. He already has. But the people who believe that he's only gonna get the dumb side of Americans who believe him killed are so wrong. That's not how this works. I get a lot of Americans on vacation where I live in Portugal. And it's also true all over Europe and the rest of the world. And it is terrifying to think of the very probable outbreaks and who knows what else to come.

    And thanks, I'll use Wikipedia to read more about Lysenkoism over the weekend.

    Thank you for the reply.

  • I was registered on Lemm.ee. Now I'm registered on piefed.social. So, technically not Lemmy anymore. I do suspect a lot us moved to piefed. That was the general buzz. I genuinely don't know if the posts and comments of Piefed don't track on Lemmy. I'm sure the ones amongst piefed users in piefed instances don't though. That alone could justify a substantial part of that drop. But I'm still here interacting with Lemmy.

  • Thank you for clarifying. I'm sorry if I jumped in with my interpretation. I know who Lysenko was. But not much more than that he was a biologist who kept denying science in behalf of the state. So I didn't know if that was what you meant and that is why I apologised in the advance if I was misinterpreting it.

    But yeah, state dictating science. And the U.S. really seems to be headed to that level of catastrophes you described. I need to read more about Lysenkoism. Like I said, I didn't know much about Lysenko other than he was a scientist betraying science for the state propaganda. I don't even know if he believed the nonsense he was spreading. But then again, I don't even know if the ones doing the same now do either. And I have a hard time reading up on people like that. Makes my stomach turn in revolt.

    But as a permaculture enthusiastic and someone who has a project with his girlfriend that uses syntropic theory, I'm very curious to read about what kind of nonsense were they applying to farming back then. Do you have any suggestions to read? Like a book or an article? Or should I just put Lysenkoism in a search engine and eventually find the farming part? Would love to know more about this, so if you have some pointers, I would much appreciate to learn more about this.

  • I think it is comparing the Soviet's movement spearheaded by a biologist named Trofim Lysenko to the the current lobbying to destroy science's credibility. It was akin to the current lobbying against scientific integrity that started in the U.S. and bled everywhere else. People will immediately think of the hacks that move through the podcasts these days, I'm sure you can think of a few too. It's using a veil of pseudoscience to confuse the layman and advance the purpose of a few under another veil, one of an ideology. Lysenko was very much like the figures of today like that kermit the frog imitation that passes for scientific expert on the "dumbtube". I don't want to name these horrific hacks. They're already taking too much of the bandwidth as it is and for far too long. And I hate that most people that think they're too smart to fall for their crap, fall right into the next trap, which is to go argue and generate more visibility for them. These people never learned the old online code "Do Not Feed The Troll". We spotted them and let them starve. But I compared them more to Gremlins, because they multiply. The grifers spot the grift and chime in for the take.

    I hope I didn't misinterpreted the comment you asked about. But Lysenkoism is a great shorthand to describe it all indeed.