rumimevlevi @ rumimevlevi @lemmings.world

Posts

20

Comments

1,067

Joined

3 mo. ago

The only victims of calling palestinian supporter antisemitic is non zionists jews who will exprerience more real antisemitism

All the major western countries still back up israel and.was celebrsting them attacking Iran. Unfortunately israel is not a rogue state yet

Dying for your cat. That so dumb

You

You the guy who claimed yesteray that zionism was noble at first then become.violence and genocidal and todsy you are mocking palestinians getting bombed in a coffee shop

Piers won't talk about israel history of rapping palestinians since the nekba

Saudis are the USA ally so nothing will happen to them

What is something that you wish had a good open-source alternative but does not at this time?

Musicolet

It doesn't matter the palestinian autority is ruling. The palestinian autority respected oslo accords israel didn't. Israel has the obligation to stop illegal settlements and get the hell out of the west bank.

they literally gave Gaza back

The UN said israel didn't

palestinians could have created a paradise for themselves, working with Egypt and setting up economic trade routes and business

Israel could have not occupy Palestine is 67 and not continuing to build illegal settlements to live in peace

I will also repeat occupation is illegal no matter what your pretext is, illegal settlements is illegal no matter what your pretext is, raping and torturing Palestinians in jail is illegal, collective punishment is illegal but you are a savage who support Zionist extremism but you dare calling me an Islamist terrorist supporter with no proof , you such a peace of human trash

Cool, call your friends in Iran, Qatar, UAE, Dubai, or any other trillion dollar petrostate and they can take them, problem solved, no more terrorist attacks on Israel and palestinians can be free and happy

Or a better idea the USA and Germany can take all Israelis to their countries. You also know that during world wars the west didn't want jews so they threw them in Israel

lost all focus of the original intention: to escape persecution.

They could have escaped percussion and live as normal citizens of Palestine but no the plan of Herzl was always to impose a state and displace the local population

Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

The property owners will come over to our side. According to my conception, the majority of the local population will have to be transferred elsewhere.

We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

Nazi was quickly in position of power so they was able to execute their plan very fast at first Nazism exclusion, discrimination, and the removal of Jews from German society then the final solution and the holocaust . Zionism needed more time to do it. Now in 2025 we are in the final stage of Zionism , the complete eradication of Palestinians in Gaza and slowly continuing eating the west bank

The Nazis were doing mass shooting, the IDF did mass shooting and mass bombing. Both the Nazis and the idf are starving people. The Nazis used gas chambers, the idf is shooting at people seeking aids with the new terrorist organization claiming to be an aid organization.

I am not saying both are equally the same and that the genocide in Gaza is worse than the holocaust but i think it is still fair to compare both rhetoric and methods

Hamas do not rule the west bank and the west bank is palestinians isrsel should get the hell out of there. That's what international law say.

Nothing justify israel actions in the west bank

Zionism was a solution to Jewish statelessness and persecution. In its early conception, Zionism was not a tool of oppression, but rather a form of self-determination.

Zionists had no right to impose a state in any country. Even if the state was in Argentine or Japan or the USA, the population would have not accepted either. Facing a persecution is not a valid argument against imposing a state on the land of people who had nothing to do with the oppression .

No matter how peaceful the ideology started , fact is fact Zionism became violent and is the source of the whole conflicts with the help of the British empire.

Herlz also asked support from antisemites

Zionists are similar tool of oppressiom to nazis

The Jewish people began by buying the land legally in the late 1800s as a way to escape persecution. That pissed off the local Arabs (understandably) and both of them started arguing—which was not usually violent until 1920-30ish

Arab was pissed of when the zionists plan became clear. Owning lands do not give you right to declare a state

There was a group of Yemeni jews who settled in palestine and people was fine with them. Arabs and those jews was going to each other festivities.

But those people still elect those parties thst support israel. Why those parties would listen to people?

I was afraid for my life" is a fine argument for firing back if someone pulls a gun and starts shooting at you. It's ridiculous when it comes from a cop who opens fire on a kid with something in his hands.

Only if the risk is so eminent . Israel used the same argument to occupy gaza and the west bank in 67. Even if Israel goal of occupation is extermination of Palestinians and Russia is to make Ukraine part of Russia again occupation is occupation .

I don't see any other way to interpret Putin mentioning that Ukraine used to be part of Russia and that Ukrainians are just Russian

The parts of Ukraine Russia controls right now were trying to break away from Ukraine before the war

I know that there is separatist movements in them but we don't know how much of the population backing it up

Sorry i mistaken you for the other person that I reply to. I also talked with the other guy about republicans vs democrats and not Trump vs Biden and Obama.

It cannot be overstated how completely different these situations are. Israel is trying to exterminate Palestinians. Russia does not want Ukraine to be part of a hostile, nuclear-armed military pact. Palestinians are fighting because otherwise Israel will kill them. Ukrainians are fighting because their coup government is having its strings pulled by NATO

While i agree russia isn't trying to ethenic cleansing ukranians the argument they use it's still the same in my opinion. I think Putin want to make ukraine part of russia without erasing ukrsnian identity but if ukranians want to stay independent russia should respect that. I don't see any other reason why Putin said that Ukraine used to be part of Russia