roteradler @ roteradler @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

16

Joined

2 yr. ago

Its only about IPs, that's the easiest way to make a ton of money with nearly zero effort. Video games have way more fans globally than superhero comics.

They did not bring back Dire Wolves, they made another kind of wolf look like Dire Wolves. The rest of the genetics have nothing to do with Dire Wolves.

Its annoying, but someone has to compete against Microsoft. MS is buying everything in preparation for the streaming era and we need a company that's big enough to offer a second service. And to everyone praising the gamepass, as soon as MS beats Sony, they'll increase the prices AF.

How are they ahead of their time? AC is just grinding and grinding and grinding. Mario ist jumping jumping and jumping. They do good lvl design but that's it. No story, no characters, no innovative gameplay, nearly always just more of the same. Imagine Sony still releasing God of War games with gameplay like the PS2 and PS3 games, they would get hated into oblivion.

Everyone is free to like the games they want and I'm not saying that Nintendo games aren't fun, but they're overhyped. Nintendo is a lazy ass company, they innovate only when it is necessary. Without their IPs they would have already gone bankrupt or developer only. They had more than one crappy console, that nearly ruined the company (newest esample: Wii U). Another example are the Pokémon games, where is the innovation? It needs more than five types of garbage can Pokemon's to call it innovation. And instead of doing good games they keep suing other indie companies that are capable of making better games than Nintendo itself after developing that ip for over 2 decades.

No, I'm saying, that Nintendo wouldnt benefit at all from AI, so why should they use it in the first place? And the reasons for that are:

-AI in it's current state can only support in certain areas -Nintendo's games aren't massive enough to profit from the things AI can do atm

An example: AI can do Text to Speech, but Nintendo doesn't make games like TES. Nintendo needs to optimise their games highly to run on a switch, which AI can't do.

He is just stating the obvious, like saying the sun is hot.

I totally get your point and agree with it. I still play on my Vita, GB and PSP to this day.

What I'm criticising here is Nintendo as a company and the article itself. Is obvious that they don't want AI because they can't handle it and they don't need it. AI atm can replace artists and actors but Nintendo games have nearly nothing to synchronise and the models for the games aren't that difficult to make. So why should Nintendo care for AI anyway? Just take a look at Google and the other companies spending billions every year just to train their AIs.

Nintendo can't even do games on a technical standard higher than 2012, how should they use AI? And their hardware is way to weak as well BTW.

They're just lucky that the current AI Models are crap, otherwise this would be the next standard they're missing in their "more of the same since 1980" games.

They should use more energy and money for developing innovative games than suing every fart on the planet.

In the pixel phones it's used to kill your battery life.

Like the US 😁

It's fast, lightweight and clean. Compatibility to office docs is also very good, it even repaired a big excel file which MS Excel broke and wasn't able to recover.

Widelands and OpenRCT

OpenSUSE Tumbleweed with Gnome

We have policies on Europe but even they do not help. The ad business is completely out of control, on some sites there are over 200 as companies gathering your data and selling them through the real time bidding system. it's impossible to know who bought the data. just have a look what's been uncovered lately.

https://mastodon.social/@wchr/111410591996456032

Yeah Microsoft and respectful.

I'm curious to see which currently running franchise they're going to mess up first.

I hope they simulate the overheating handwarming as well. Without this iconic feature the Pixel experience wouldn't be complete.

8