That's close to what Scalia/Thomas argued but that's not what the majority opinion says. They explicitly say you always have the ability to plead the fifth and have it not be used as evidence. And it's true. You never have to self incriminate. But their argument is you have to make it explicit, which is frankly dumb.
The decision to pursue the indictment against Abrego Garcia led to the abrupt departure of Ben Schrader, a high-ranking federal prosecutor in Tennessee, sources briefed on Schrader's decision told ABC News.
That's at least good to see.
He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found
Bondi misrepresenting just what a grand jury is and what they decide without ABC correcting it is not good to see though.
That's the trick. An example is the am I being detained thing. A clock of reasonableness starts ticking as soon as you're detained until the detention is considered a potentially unlawful arrest, but that detention doesn't start until the officer tells you you can't leave. Also a cop has to have a valid reason to detain you or anything you say will be inadmissible in court. Until you ask that magic phrase, though, you're having a consensual encounter and everything you say(or not say) will always be admissible.
Oh I'm not saying that they don't engage in extreme attacks on who they consider their enemies. But Trump rapidly flips on who his enemy and who his friend is based on the situation. He's had that relationship with most of the GOP. Without the staff I honestly don't think he'd be able to keep it together. Sometimes he shifts based straight up on who he's in the room with and how they're treating him at that exact moment. What I'm trying to say is there's no actual calculation or payback in his mind. It's entirely binary and subject to rapid shifts. Classic black and white thinking/cluster b splitting.
That's where you're wrong. They both constantly rewrite the past in their own memories. Shit one takes massive doses of disassociatves and the other can't be bothered to digest a single thought. They can make up and act like nothing ever happened and they're both the greatest. To hold a grudge you need to be able to hold a coherent opinion on anything and not exist in a perpetual stream of consciousness.
The US supreme Court has decided that remaining silent isn't actually asserting your fifth amendment right to remain silent. You need to actually affirm it. Nobody's even pretending there's logic to this shit. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas
More powerful tool to initiate a parasympathetic response while also toning your buccalis: closing your mouth and pinching your nose and exhaling to puff out your cheeks while bearing down like you're trying to take a shit (post)
(Don't start doing this just because you read it in a shit posting community or you may pass out)
This lady sure is toxic, but on the flip side these sort of depositions are exactly why folks often avoid actually pursuing justice over sexual misconduct. I'm conflicted by the entire thing.
That's a treadmill. You have to eat and drink more micro plastics to replace the lost blood. Bloodletting was the opposite you wanted to do with melancholic illness btw. You wanted to increase sanguine humor(blood, the opposite of black bile) so you ate and drank sanguine foods(meat and gravy, red wine) while taking laxatives and enemas.
Hilariously there is one aspect of this that is actually accurate to modern suggestions. To increase sanguine humor you should exercise and get hot and sweaty (sanguine humor is considered hot and wet). Vigorous exercise is considered by modern medicine to be good for depression.
Well I mean what do you expect. I mean this sincerely. If your job is to supposedly to reduce wasteful expenses and you're not finding them: you're the wasteful expense. Mission accomplished.
🗿🗿🗿🗿