rodneylives @ rodneylives @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

88

Joined

2 yr. ago

Same here. Nothing could convince me to go back to Reddit or Twitter at this point.

It is a mistake to lead off with "here's the thing about Elon Musk," because there's LOADS of things with Musk, but in particular. Let's set aside how ludicrous it is to claim that the protesters are being funded by some outside source, because sure that's worked in the past, and of course it's the Democrats, those notably cash-positive people, who are doing it.

Elon Musk is THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD. If anyone could beat a theoretical money-backed protest against him, it would be him. Just offer to beat the offer of anyone funding the protesters. That's it! If they're only in it for the money then the protest would fold immediately.

More than that, Musk has literally paid people to vote in his favor in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race! The levels of hypocrisy are so staggeringly great that it risks materializing actual hippopotamuses on his properties.

Slant's one of my favorites too, I also play a lot of Loopy, Dominosa and Bridges.

I've heard of them, I might consider trying one someday, but the research and effort to set it up is an obstacle. Plus I don't run Windows any more, and I don't even know what Linux support for it is like.

I'm sorry but... 20 years behind? What new features has, say, Word even offered in the past 20 years beside that damn ribbon?

I haven't checked to see if someone's mentioned it yet (it's a long thread!) but I want to put in a word for a piece of software I'm always touting: Simon Tatham's Puzzle Collection!

It's a wonder! 40 different kinds of randomly-generated puzzles, all free, all open source, and available for practically every platform. You can play it on Windows, Mac (if you compile it), Linux, iOS, Android, Java and Javascript in a web browser. It should rightfully be high up on the iOS and Android stores, but it's completely free, has no ads, doesn't track you and has no one paying to promote it. No one has a financial incentive to show it to you, so they don't. But you should know about it.

I think you're overstating things a bit, but it's true that I keep getting caught up by weird behaviors.

I paste image data into a layer. I drag the layer a bit to get it where I want it. I try drawing on that layer: nothing happens. Turns out, when I pasted the image, it created a layer the size of the current image with all the extra space filled with transparent pixels. When I dragged it, the transparent part of the layer that had been off the image's borders was actually dead space, and it won't accept drawing into it until I go under layers and choose to expand the layer to the dimensions of the image. Once you realize what's happening it's not so bad, but until that point it's the software working how you don't expect it, and some people are going to drive themselves batty trying to figure it out.

And just now in 3.0 I've discovered, if I copy a rectangular part of an image using the Rectangle Select tool, then paste that data into another program, what gets pasted is a transparent box the size of the original image full of transparent pixels, with the copied part opaque in the middle of it in its former position inside the image.

It seems like it's purposely trying to come up with an unintuitive way to implement my actions. I don't remember it being like this in the past. What happened?

City of Heroes, everything by Atari Games, the Wizardry series, the Ultima series, many others. I'm old, and I remember some of the games, and developers, we've lost.

What will probably happen is a one or two term slump. What's different between then and now is the internet and social media, which fills most people's brains with a deluge of noise. In addition to the effects of misinformation daily telling people that the moon is the sun, most algorithms prioritize novelty, and nothing's more novel than the most stupidly wrong-headed take. We constantly hear the opinions of people who should be laughed out of the room! We sit and chuckle, but there's tens of millions of people who have poor media skills who it can actually influence.

Something I've seen far less reaction to than I expected? While the Switch 2 looks like it takes standard MicroSD cards, it DOESN'T. It takes the fairly obscure MicroSD Express standard! I can't even BUY an SD Express card locally right now! It seems likely, at launch, that Nintendo's branded cards will be the only ones people can get that will work with it!

The Switch 2 has 256GB of onboard storage, much more than the Switch, it is true. But it's also backwards compatible with the Switch, and lets users bring their old digital library over with them. I have a 256GB card in my Switch, it's nearly full, and it doesn't have my whole library on it! If I got a Switch 2, I'd have it filled up on day 1!

And the MicroSD card issue won't be obvious to most buyers. Parents will get their kids Switch 2s, and wonder why their old card won't work with it. It'll look to them like the Switch 2 or the card is broken, unless they implement a physical lock against incompatible cards, and I don't know if SD cards even support those. Also, SD Express cards are more expensive than standard ones.

This could end up being a debacle almost on the scale of the price (which, as others have noted, isn't even Nintendo's fault entirely).

There are so many weird things about GIMP, and it feels like they add more over time. I've moved a layer and then tried to draw on it and had nothing happen. Why? Because the layer was created as an array of pixels the size of the image, and when I move it there's now a dead zone where there's no pixels in the visible image. It turns out there's a special command to expand moved layers to fill the image: https://docs.gimp.org/3.0/en/gimp-layer-resize-to-image.html

There are times using it that it feels like a maze to navigate to just get my changes reflected in the document.

Back in the day there was Hardware Wars.

I know FlyingSquid from another community, and sent them a private message just a few days ago saying hello. (I didn't know they had been missing at the time.) FS is awesome, and I really hope they're okay.

I handle this, as do most poor people, by not asking ourselves this question, not even fantasizing about it, for why torture yourself with something you never can do?

The secret of Linux is, if all your hardware works, it's actually easier to use for casual users. Most people nowadays use computers for web browsing and maybe playing media and light office tasks. A Linux Mint setup will have everything you need for that either preinstalled or ready to get fun the software store. If you don't need anything else, then it gets it of your way and just works. No viruses, little danger of malware, no crud to uninstall, no Microsoft account, no nagging apps, no ads, no attempts to upsell to paid cloud services or Pro, and no AI.

The problem arises when you want to go beyond that, and there's no obvious path ahead,v then people not used to the Linux way of doing things may run into trouble. But 90% of users, if someone sets it up for them, will do fine.

Both were great, but both also took me a week to get through, a piece at a time.

Along these lines, I have several important memory locations memorized. POKE 53280 and 1 to change the border and background colors. 828 is the cassette buffer, and 49152 the free memory above BASIC ROM. SYS 64738 resets the machine.

I also can recite the powers of 2 up to 65536.

Way back in Sunday School at the church we went to when I was growing up, they taught them to us in a song. I still remember the whole thing.

Recently, McDonalds announced an initiative to remove all instances of Ronald McDonald from their stores.

So, Ronald McDonald removed all instances of McDonalds from around him.

I too have recently switched to Linux, on multiple machines. It sounds like you've already found your solution, but I'll put some of my own reflections in here anyway, in case it's helpful and for other people who might be interested.

The first step I'd suggest in installing Linux on hardware not made specifically for it is to test your prospective distribution with a Live CD. Try to use all the hardware that you'd use normally. Linux has made great strides in compatibility, and I've had hardware that Windows has abandoned still work on The Penguin, but there are still plenty of hardware manufacturers out there who don't care about Linux compatibility, especially if they focus on general consumer or creative fields. New devices that come out, that you might want, might not have Linux drivers. (I recently had to deal with this with an iskn "the Slate2+" that I had to take special measures to use with my Linux-running laptops.) I also have an old integrated desktop machine with a built-in touchscreen monitor, and support for the touch part of the screen seems to vary across distributions. Another issue is getting networking working if your machine has Broadcom wireless, still the bane of some prospective Linux users even after all these years. If you're thinking on installing on a machine whose hardware you're unsure of, especially, test it out with a Live CD first!

Second, pick a good distribution. There are two general types of distros, those that periodically release whole new versions of themselves that you'll have to decide if you want to upgrade to, and "rolling distros." Of the first type there's Debian, Ubuntu, Mint and Fedora; of the second, there's Arch, Manjaro and Gentoo.

Which you'll want to use depends on your use case and technical skill and willingness to search for info on problems and fix them yourself. Upgrade distributions tend to be more monolithic, with all the software thoroughly tested, but except for specific software like web browsers, you probably won't be using the latest versions of the included software, and instead will get multiple programs updated at once when you upgrade your distribution. This may not be a problem for you, but if you like using the latest versions of software you will probably get bored with waiting with an upgrade distro. The best upgrade distro for beginners is probably Mint.

The alternative is a "rolling" release distro. These upgrade software much more frequently (although again, not always immediately). Reduced testing is generally how they can release more often. One of these is Arch Linux, which is Not For Beginners, but Manjaro is based on Arch and is pretty beginner-friendly.

Another issue is software dependencies. When new versions of software are released, ideally they'll be perfectly compatible with past versions, and will work well with all the other programs on your system that rely on it. But sometimes this won't be true, it won't be obvious how the new behavior breaks things, and so doing an update of one package will break something seemingly unrelated. This is why upgrade distos are a bit more stable. It also explains the rise of Flatpaks, a special means of distributing programs that bundle up all their dependencies with them, and run somewhat in isolation from the rest of your system. That part of Flatpaks is good; the problem is when you install one, and you're informed that little utility you want to run may take a gigabyte or more of disk space. Flatpaks can be EXTREMELY wasteful in terms of used disk space, but because they allow developers to avoid having to worry about compatibility with different library versions, they're quite popular as a means of releasing software right now, and some software (I'm looking at you in particular, Handbrake) only distribute in Flatpaks. I personally find Flatpaks to be tremendously wasteful and that they negate one of Linux's biggest virtues, that it can be really compact and leave more space for your own files, but there will be times when they're a lifesaver.

If all of this seems forbidding to you... I'd say that it's really not that much different from Windows, but just in its own way? Windows has its own problems, especially with security, and Microsoft tends to overcome these problems by throwing resources at them, not just theirs but your computer's too. Windows Defender imposes its overhead upon nearly everything your machine does. And they also always are shoehorning whatever crazy tech fad they're in love with this week, whether it's AI, voice assistants, widgets or what else. I've used computers long enough to remember "Active Desktop" and "Channels," and I can tell you that Microsoft is CONSTANTLY doing this. And MacOS isn't immune to it either, although it tends to be better.

There are certainly some Linux distros that do this too (esp Ubuntu, ask someone who remembers Ubiquity), but generally Linux is much much better about it. Ask yourself, how much do you really hate the idea of AI built into your computer's OS? In my case, it was very much super angry rage, and so here I am on Mint. I hope it works out well for you too!