this is certainly one part of it.
non-passing trans women being seen as predetory men, trying to invade women spaces and even less real women than passimg trans women is another big part of it and thats really not a universal women's experience.
idk if u disagre with this, ur comment just left me feeling like u were making a point about the entirety of transmysogynie
isreal was intended as an ethnostate from the get go. palastinians were second class citizens at best, since the colonisation began. this is bot an issue with constitutions. isreal was always intended to be this way. palastinians where never supposed to have any kind of power or live next to israelis as equals.
ok, i see. this is a complete misunderstanding then.
i undersrand "heterosexual" as being attracted to a person of a different gender then ones own. this is what i operated on and i think if you go back and reread what i said, while keeping this in mind, this should clear things up.
Which is wrong on multiple levels.
now, what you did here is exactly what you are accusing me of. you are imposing your definition of heterosexuality onto me and denying my own.
I as a man can only be heterosexual if I exclusively am attracted to women.
ok, please keep in mind i am a nonbimary person myself.
while i am not denying you your definition and never did, i consider claiming that heterosexuality is inherently nonbinary exclusive, to be quite binarynormative, bordering on nonbinaryphobic. heterosexuality is not just something for binary people. a binary person saying they are not attracted to nonbinary people because they are striaght, is a massive red flag to me.
And enbies are not women, even if AFAB. They are neither man nor woman, that's what makes them non-binary, that's the point.
if i were uncharitable, i could say, that your defnition for nonbinary is excluding nonbinary men and women (which is an actual and valid thing ppl identify as) and denying peoples genders. i wont tho, because i get what you mean.
i hope you can understand how you behaved immendsy rude here. you attacked me seemingly without even trying to understand what i am saying and in the process you repeatedly did exactly what you accused me of doing, arguably in worse.
wtf i never did that. i state a fact in a lighthearted way during a fitting moment and you come in here, accuse me of things i didnt do TWICE and refuse to argue any further
But for example some folks only like their own gender and enbys. Your definition would exclude those people.
not true, liking ur own gender is homosexual and liking enbies as someone who is not an enby is heterosexual. no exclusion there
the definition i use is literally the original definiton of bisexual. this is not a common misconception.
many of us don't like being portrayed that way
a lot of bisexual ppl vibe with it, it is the original meaning of the word and it is relavant in the context of my comment.
if you dont want to word it that way for yourself, fine and fair, but dont run around telling ppl its wrong and they cant say it. you are excluding ppl
yeah, same🥺🥺