Yep, pretty much, though the particle itself is the energy, not some kind of energy it gives off.
Mass and energy are convertible between each other, so you can think of it as the black hole losing mass equal to the mass of the particle, if it helps.
It's not a particle in the regular sense you might know, like an electron. The pair that comes into existence is meant to annihilate immediately (meaning there's zero energy gain or loss) but because of where it appeared it can't.
When it appears as I described, there suddenly exists a real particle in the universe outside the black hole, so the universe gained +1 in energy.
But energy can't be created or destroyed, so that +1 means somewhere there must be a -1. And that somewhere is the black hole which caused the particle to exist in the first place by swallowing its pair.
It's not very intuitive, that's the fun part about quantum mechanics: nothing is intuitive.
Depends on your definition of "true". Is it scientifically true? No. Is it the actual science simplified a lot so it can be read by a non-physicist human being? Yes.
Well, that's just a blog. WordPress comes to mind, though try not abusing it by installing too many plugins and transforming it to an abomination that takes 3 seconds to hack.
There are probably more modern alternatives, I personally wrote my own blog system that uses ActivityPub to synchronise with Lemmy and others.
Very often a virtual particle–antiparticle pair appears and because they're very happy they started existing, they immediately hug each other not knowing that will cause them to annihilate each other and disappear.
Every once in a while, the pair appears in a very interesting position: one is outside the event horizon of a black hole (let's call this one Pinocchio) and the other inside it (let's call it 3735928559). Because nothing can escape a black hole, they can't really hug, so Pinocchio says "I'm a real boy particle" and stops being virtual and becomes real, while 3735928559 continues its descent into madness singularity.
Unfortunately, the process means there now exists something (Pinocchio) where there wasn't anything before and that takes energy. And that energy comes from the particle that stayed behind which is now part of the black hole, so it effectively takes energy out of the black hole. You may have heard that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed, that's essentially what happens here.
The Pinocchios go away from the black hole, so they can end up basically anywhere in the universe.
As for the timescales, they entirely depend on the black hole's size. Really tiny black holes evaporate in a matter of seconds, the supermassive ones in a matter of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions... years.
In fact, black holes will be the last macroscopic structures to exist in the universe because the evaporation is extremely slow - every planet and every star and every gas cloud and every atom will cease to exist long before the last black hole evaporates.
Just an advice: tell your gf you really don't want to read it, that you need a break and that you mean it. Either she respects that or you need to find a new gf, preferably one who respects boundaries.
Yeah, that's true, everyone thinks they want a senior where usually someone who's not a straight up junior is more than enough. And a fast learning and motivated junior is the best you can get, IMO, though those are pretty rare as well.
I have the opposite experience, when I was doing interviews I just skipped the very obviously underskilled people (which, IIRC were in the single digits) and interviewed pretty much everyone.
For context, I'm the main architect and dev of the company I was hiring for. Most of the candidates were horrible.
I can think of multiple reasons a straight man could get aroused by seeing a dick.
First, erections don't occur only because of arousal, they can happen from adrenaline as well. I guess if you're a homophobe and are about to watch gay porn as part of research, you might get a bit of adrenaline.
Another reason I can think of is that most straight men see a dick when they watch porn, meaning their brain may make the association of "dick on screen = some hot nude lady is gonna show up".
Not autocorrect, but I let my phone suggest words and manually choose the one I want because I'm unable to write without mistakes on touch screen keyboards.
Well, it means there's no objective right or wrong without context. And we people are the context, so while there's no right or wrong, no magical karma system that would judge your actions, there are things that are very obviously right or wrong from the point of view of other people.
Nah, hormones are just a chemical compound. It's the brain that gives them meaning. Which itself is pointless without the body which gives it context.
We're really the whole package - you're as much your legs as you are your brain.
Modern research usually shows that - your body and your mental health are deeply connected. A trauma physically alters your brain. How you feel directly shapes how healthy you are. And how healthy you are shapes how you feel.
Yeah, their work-the-workers-literally-to-death culture is top notch.