I played for a bit during the beta a few months ago (before the third race was in the game) and it was quite fun but clearly very far from finished. It should be in a better state when early access starts in a couple weeks, but I'm sure there will still be many rough edges.
The names are like Harris, Newsom, Whitmer, Buttigieg, etc., but getting everyone to agree to one of those is a long shot. I'm not convinced that switching to any of those people would give the Dems a better chance at winning the election.
Why I'm surprised by a candidate saying they're ok with their felonious opponent winning the election? I'm genuinely curious how you're genuinely curious that I'm surprised by that.
I think Biden's response to the question is being slightly misrepresented, but it's certainly not the kind of response I'd want to hear, especially as a followup to the debate.
"Hotter than the devils draws (as in underwear) outsides" : It's hot. No one uses "draws" for underwear anymore I guess, so I've started saying "hotter than the devils asshole" but it's not as "poetic."
It's actually "drawers" but I guess they sound the same in certain accents.
Something makes me think people would be more willing to take vaccines when facing down a life or death coin flip. At that point their "concerns" over long term effects don't matter as much.
I think they mean the person who made the comment.