I think we might be well past the days of honest natural sport. Thats not me saying we should be cheating, but trying to get back to that isnt possible, we have to figure this out moving forward not just for women or trans people but for all the other ways science affects sports.
Its not natural that someone with enough money for the best training science can provide them is almost guaranteed to be in the top percentiles of their sport.
What's interesting is that this has been true since at least roman times, with funding going towards training and gear, even if the participants themselves might not be wealthy.
First thank you for taking the time to type all of that out.
I think I follow your theory well enough but (I know this is 2 weeks later so I won't look up any new information) I was under the impression delta was an outlier in their response compared to other airlines.
And one point about redundancies. Why shouldnt they consider a single operating system as a single failure point? If all 6 servers in the multiple locations all run windows, and windows fails thats awful right? Can they not dual boot orhavee a second set of servers? I do this in my own home but maybe thats not something that scales well.
I'm interested if your opinion has changed now that there has been a bit of time to have some more data come out on it.
Because to those outside of religion, its a choice to be religious. All of those least worst Muslims or good Muslims or good Christians or whatever you want to say, all should not be in those religions to begin with.
I'm not saying to destroy the community, break off and make your own "fuck the shitty versions of our religions" sect.
At some point people need to be held to their decisions, despite the community social pressure aspect, as the only way to counter that is equal and opposite pressure.
If you can figure out how to remain in a religion and cause that kind of backlash then I suppose you would be the exception.
Just to summarize, all religions are bad, so being part of them is bad too, even if you are a good person. Can't be a good Nazi right?
Aren't you being purposefully obtuse by refusing to consider the idea of a battery swappable phone that is IP68 certified? Its almost certainly going to happen with the line of phones in Europe that will have swappable batteries and it's not even that far into the future.
I think this post is about change moving forward, not making sure our past decisions were sound.
They didnt say greedy landlord, they said they had a bad experience with their visit. I'm not sure why you are jumping to make excuses for an imaginary landlord in the first place. The only information you have to go on so far is negative and you have no reason not to trust it.
What does a greedy short stay landlord look like to you? Some would say charging a cleaning fee and also requiring the person to clean the place themselves would be double dipping or, dare I say, greed?
What about when there are no longer new families moving into your neighborhood because there just aren't enough houses to rent out these days and profits have to keep going up?
If a landlord is focused on profits above all else, they are greedy. If they hold the quality of their service for their tenants above all else, good chance they aren't motivated by greed.
I'm not sure about your country but here we have hotels that offer family style rooms with full kitchens in them. The ones ive stayed in weren't much more than a non-kitchen room either.
I think the assumption is youll cook for yourself in those types of hotels. Most of them have laundry on site too.
Well assume I do and that was my response. I'm sure thats not all it takes to convince someone a conspiracy isn't true.
How do conspiracy folk answer that counterpoint?