recall519 @ recall519 @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

76

Joined

5 mo. ago

No, I actually think SBA lenders are not sending any money to 11yos. I think this is most likely a record keeping error.

I do also think the Twitter post is confusing SSA and SBA. The SSA sending social security I am 100% for. SBA lenders sending money to business I am also 100%, even if they are 11yos. I just think it is highly unlikely that in a single year, banks decided to loan an unprecedented $300m to 11yos and that those thousands of loans all had mismatching names with their SSNs.

I'm just saying everyone shouldn't go rallying behind this person who is making claims without any evidence. It's just as dumb as DOGE.

You clearly don't know the basics of how an SBA loan works so I'm not sure why you are even making statements as if you're an expert.

Also, I'm not giving an opinion on the legality of the situation. I'm stating the Twitter post is based on no provided evidence so everyone in this thread defending against another ridiculous statement with more ridiculous statements shows that both sides are equally willfully ignorant and susceptible to propaganda.

I'm on the side that thinks it's likely a record keeping error because the names do not match the SSNs. Also, banks are the actual lenders behind SBAs and it's highly unlikely that in one specific year, banks decided to loan out over $300m to over thousands of businesses with credit checks that did not match the name returned on an SSN with the name of the person being lent too.

Civ 7 is out?

I agree, but the Twitter post isn't DOGE and is potentially incorrect. You don't battle disinformation with more disinformation.

This week I'm going to try out ungoogled Chromium and Vivaldi. I know Vivaldi is partially closed source, but I'm not actually in the camp that thinks all closed source is bad.

Those are for SSA, not SBA. They don't explain why SBA would be brokering business loans with 11yos. There is likely a valid explanation here, but the media doesn't need to get up in arms until more details are available.

Warning everyone that I could not find a source for this and this Twitter post isn't any evidence in itself. So if you're saying I told you so, then you're just as susceptible as the people who believe $300m was being sent to 11yos without any explanation.

https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/03/mozilla-rewrites-firefoxs-terms-of-use-after-user-backlash/

https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/03/mozilla-rewrites-firefoxs-terms-of-use-after-user-backlash/

Eh, I think that's a stretch. Right now, Lemmy is going nuclear on Firefox. Should I also stop using Librewolf, too, because ultimately, it contributes to Firefox? Chromium is solid and I think it's better to show what type of chromium we want instead of outright boycotting the entire open source project.

What's wrong with ungoogled-chromium? Or Vivaldi?

Yakuza, especially the earlier in the series.

I live in NA. There are no other options. Occasionally there is an Air Alaska flight.

Is there an airline we shouldn't be boycotting?

An option, but not fully open source.

Which is fine. At the end of the day, it's another technology with uses and abuses.

What better chromium based browser is there?

Show me the data.

Trump received less than 300k more votes in 2024 than in 2020. That is less than 1% increase. Adjusted for the voting population, he actually received less votes in 2024 than 2020.

Harris received about 10 MILLION less votes in 2024 than Biden in 2020, about a 13% decrease.

Sure, when you look at percentages, it seems like there was a swing, but that's just not true. The data shows every year, Republicans vote for Republicans, but Democrats do not vote at all when they don't fully support their leader (not even for a third party).

The exact same thing happened with Obama, but inverse. There were historically high increase in voter turnout because the constituents actually supported him.

Data shows that increase in voter turnout correlates with Blue wins. That's not debatable.

Not really. There wasn't a huge swing of people switching from Democrats or independents to vote for Trump. Those target groups just decided not to vote. In other words, it's not like more people are relating to Trump's messages, but it's people not relating with either's message and feeling apathetic. This is why Trump bashing isn't helping. There needs to be genuine improvement of the Democratic party itself.

Fair enough. Good luck on your journey!