IDK I do not want to see Trump running in 2028, 2032, 2036. I may be voting for him for his policies, but I am growing weary of his rhetoric and antics and am ready to move past him and get to whatever the future of the GOP is going to be. Especially if it's not MAGA.
If Mark Zuckerberg keeps breaking the law and gets Meta constantly fined, tanking the stockholder value, heck yeah he's gonna be out of a job. That's a relatively big consequence as far as consequences go.
The US Army releasing a statement that a) what Trump and his campaign did there was illegal and b) that they physically attacked the person who tried to stop them from breaking the law isn’t good enough for you?
Why would it be? Does the government tell the truth all the time?
It's not surprising though. During election season, interested parties both for and against censorship and election interference get more vocal and forceful on the matter.
I mean something like 10 to 20 years sounds fair to me if that's the appropriate sentence (IDK what election interference sentences look like), which would probably end up being the rest of his life anyways
Sort of? They're similar but this is in reference to Zuckerberg admitting he colluded with the government to temporarily censor a negative story about Hunter Biden.
The logical line of "when the guy I don't like says anything, he really means what I say he means" is pretty errant and toxic. I cringe when the right does it too, "you can tell a Democrat is lying because they've opened their mouth". It's stupid and ridiculous.
IDK what happened for sure at the cemetery, I'd need some footage and to read up on the pertaining law a little before I make a judgement on that.
Fair enough. The "perfect phone call" was actually pretty bad, it's the one case against him that I think probably has a lot of merit. I was thinking at the time that it was probably illegal.
Yeah I was kind of curious as to how this story would be spun into a negative story against Trump. Anyone who does something illegal should be sentenced appropriately. Maybe "the president can't set the sentence" will be the tack with this one?
Haha he is probably referring to acquiescing to government requests to censor stories that could help Trump in an election. Which doesn't make the most sense because Zuckerberg himself says that he regrets doing that in the past and won't do it in the future. Maybe he wants to make sure?
I'm mostly saying I don't get the American trend of fetishizing foreign cultures and leaving the country to explore them when you haven't even experienced different angles of American culture yet
That's like saying "putting a murderer to death doesn't bring the victim back".
Like, okay. And? Restitution is not the point of penalties like these, it's to punish the perpetrators and deter others from doing the same in the future.
