Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RX
r3df0x ✡️✝☪️ @ r3df0x @7.62x54r.ru
Posts
16
Comments
319
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • There is a lot of job discrimination in hiring of autistic people, especially when it's hard to fire them.

    Many places actively profile for it and consider symptoms to be red flags since they can't explicitly ask. This is why making it hard to fire people hurts the disadvantaged.

  • I can easily imagine hiring managers tossing out job applications of people who have a family history of autism, but that's more a problem of it being too hard to fire them if they're a problem.

    Religious people could also use a history of mental illiness to assume satanic activity.

  • I can very easily imagine a 23 year old liberal virgin technocratic atheist saying that DNA should be collected at birth to solve crimes. These are also the same people who likely support euthanizing disabled people if they "consent" to it.

  • In this case, I agree.

    Conservatives want compelled speech laws because they know that no one wants to put up with their bigoted shit. Their free speech means that they get to misgender trans people and act like hateful bigots, while at the same time banning a white supremacist from a website means that armed men from the government should arrest the owner because that's acceptable compelled speech.