Nah I am just asking you to show that you have substance behind your words. Without proof that you've done your homework, your words are surface level and aren't worth anything.
And you have a new claim that the system got looted. When did that happen? Do you know the difference between then and now or is this again a surface level claim?
Yes we need smart people everywhere not just in politics. Be it doctors, accountants, engineers, clerks, elctricians and everywhere else. So when it comes writing the constitution, how do you select these smart people?
So your answer is you don't know you'd just accept and believe what the "smart people" tell you?
So who changes the constitution? Same smart people who wrote the bad constitution? Do you need a new set of smart people? If so how do you select these new people?
Have you given any serious thought to what you're advocatong for?
Don't forget about alienating your early adopters with your extreme ideology who were willing to ignore all the quality control issues. They would've come to buy the second or third car if only Musk knew how to keep his mouth shut.
I just came across a specific video and I remembered your comment. This whole video is good but you can start watching from 8:42 and 10:49 marks since you requested for a timestamp.
generally have to see to their own needs before being able to do the administrative work on men's behalf.
Same logic applies to men as well. And I don't like your perspective of said groups always being enemies of each other. If this perspective was uniformly adopted, queers will never have their rights because they are a minority. While the majority groups only fighting for theirs. IMHO we need to look at all these as human rights and human values. Not gay rights, trans rights, women's rights or men's rights. Otherwise we don't get anywhere.
Israel is committing genocide and it's not antisemitism to oppose war crimes.